From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE1E31F55B for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 08:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbJuE-0004Gi-Dj; Wed, 20 May 2020 08:16:50 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbJuD-0004Ga-5e for sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 20 May 2020 08:16:49 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version :Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=y+F6IYZxbvbcLU79MIY4F/OfB/XmaBq7dyqsTefgiY4=; b=T/76afEM3JuI23Z1DjnOl57BUT IY3MmKQ+IuSorWrlXnhBPX/i8sLxqFfEY2EfwN6KUhbD1XxN4oO0tTe33sF3NFQ+/IJc62AukbpOO K252LN5ftVlwDXKCV0rJml5fwxcVxUbruy8ldt4+fKYeSTWUduZSLc0Zv1r5b6UQksoE=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=y+F6IYZxbvbcLU79MIY4F/OfB/XmaBq7dyqsTefgiY4=; b=TUka9knZasprWcBxuztHrWXIsZ hshsIFD0CV9psb/VLPyb3ApC77cxpcGMrPpLOw5AsfBJFds9CNS5zWtk9E4SWHpzC1Fb2YQW6RS68 eZinbdl2/8At/17Zqr5gftRxUl4fRZ8UNeXLWkVzFUoxJDeySqY0HwvihGUo6311dFWM=; Received: from [81.2.72.234] (helo=unicorn.mansr.com) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jbJuB-00GL52-OY for sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 20 May 2020 08:16:49 +0000 Received: by unicorn.mansr.com (Postfix, from userid 51770) id 7756215360; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:16:31 +0100 (BST) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= To: tsepp2000@web.de References: Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 09:16:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: (tsepp's message of "Wed, 20 May 2020 09:46:46 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Headers-End: 1jbJuB-00GL52-OY Subject: Re: sox/mansr: DSD to PCM X-BeenThere: sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: sox-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net tsepp2000@web.de writes: > Thank you Mans, > > my question was a little more profound. I have linked 3 pictures that show > the difference between three of many ways. Some filters are also used > here. My question was about whether someone here has deeper experiences > and has also made listening comparisons about the highest quality command > for sox. The thread you linked is about conversion from PCM to DSD. > I could not attach my 3 example pictures (Spek): Every file 32 Bit Float, > Sox-files linear phase. Here the download-link: > https://www.file-upload.net/download-14089057/DSF2WAV.zip.html > The Spek-pictures: > - Xrecode3.png output 352,8kHz File (Standard-output of XRecode3) > > - Sox_rate_savL88200_gain_8_lowpass_1_25000_sinc_30000_n43.png > sox input.dsf -b 32 -e float output.wav rate -s -a -v -L 88200 gain 8 > lowpass -1 25000 sinc -30000 -n 43 That uses the rate effect, then applies some additional low-pass filtering, presumably to remove the modulator noise. > - Sox_rate_savL88200.png > sox input.dsf -b 32 -e float output.wav rate -b 99 -a -v -L 88200 And that's just the rate effect without any additional filtering. I don't quite understand what you're asking. -- = M=E5ns Rullg=E5rd _______________________________________________ Sox-users mailing list Sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users