From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS6130 216.105.38.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCB011F45A for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jPlVS-0004UA-LG; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:19:30 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jPlVR-0004U3-3v for sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:19:29 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=a3OrLxE/ol9yCKhrAs8vYmbuAVUE9/mNifcw/tLQn9I=; b=fudyl9rxfH27B5gyyuIqPqc3US m+TTQTNLDAuJ/Ih4VnKF58Ph9sJCe8JV9dQm7lWMBhBTIvrLlE+FBlguY9crJqHnCCaYTlSa7e+tV TAQ7ikMmp/5VO7qL+Q2IHMT0f1QO7CpEiK/gLL6o8p5e0VhQ3w2qXJ4FoAZhGq3XSrQk=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To: From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=a3OrLxE/ol9yCKhrAs8vYmbuAVUE9/mNifcw/tLQn9I=; b=crcz+hZgqfGVo8TRoBgZUfVweQ bwIR2YXnn+/xk06ns5P/U0onlHAGEUVrTMn1XrWU1w3bJvg2Y7Fn/Unzw4msdCjxxWbHGUYmQOUoR 2UkRvQC9oXW30VBc34CCllJEeaKqr3MO0auo72gw/x9RT9UifeZr5Pn6iiC49omF3N8U=; Received: from mx.stare.cz ([79.98.77.229]) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1jPlVL-002kR4-8m for sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:19:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (stare.cz [local]) by stare.cz (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 866d3f51 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 13:19:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 13:19:09 +0200 From: Jan Stary To: sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20200418111909.GA79024@www.stare.cz> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Headers-End: 1jPlVL-002kR4-8m Subject: Re: splice not working correctly X-BeenThere: sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: sox-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Dec 23 23:43:13, zsolt.ero@gmail.com wrote: > I'd like to use split Do you mean sox, or some splitting functionality of sox I am not aware of? SoX can split channels, but that's probably not what you want. > to mix two slightly different tracks for AB > testing purposes. I'd like to have 0..5 second from track A and 5..10 > seconds from track B, etc. 10..15 track A, 15..20 track B. > > I'd be very important to make sure that it doesn't change the signal > in any way, So you can't use splice, as that will change the signal. Why do you want to splice them, instead of merely concatenating the pieces together? > as in if I run it with identical tracks, I'd get back the > original track. If the two inputs are identical, then I guess their splice will also be identical to each of them. But if you simply concatenate the pieces (interlacing), extracting them back will give you the original two files. Jan _______________________________________________ Sox-users mailing list Sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users