Hi, a quick search for "bash to windows shell converter" on google lead to: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3200018/how-do-i-convert-a-bash-shell-script-to-a-bat-file wich seems to explain nearly all parts, you need to "translate" the bash scrip from Jan Stary into a .bat file. regards, Erich On 10.12.2016 23:28, Dr. Mark Bugeja MD wrote: > Well not all. Many files are "releases" and these would play at the end > of the corresponding main file (the moment a MIDI keyboard key is > released). That amounts to 75% of the files. So loops will need to be > created and checked for only 25% of those approx 500 files and they can > be processed literally over a few minutes with LoopAuditioneer including > pitch information insertion. Checking the loops will take a few days. > But I've been doing this regularly for thousands of files often having > an average of 6 loops per sample! It is tiring and might cause damage to > the ears with time, sadly. > > Merging is the big job. I'd be happy if I can automate this process. If > you cannot solve it because you are not versed with Windows, how am I > expected to sort that out when I don't even come close to understanding > the "logic" behind your string of characters and why it should be > different in Windows? I think I can safely state that I would be far > more confident performing a heart transplant than to play around with > this code business. :-D Consider me dylexic for coding! > > Regards, > > Mark > > > On 10/12/2016 22:53, Jan Stary wrote: >> On Dec 10 11:18:05, marcusfb@gmail.com wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> What you are saying is right. I did find one pair of files that have >>> different lengths of audio. This surprised me somewhat. Generally, >>> the files >>> are identical in length and carry the loop marks in exactly the same >>> place. >>> >>> Irrespective of any differences, I would still like to merge all the >>> pairs >>> of files into stereo. It should not be such a difficult task recreating >>> loops again and inserting pitch tuning data. LoopAuditioneer does all >>> that >>> quite fast and what is left is to check that the loops do not present >>> clicks.... again.... I can do pretty well and efficiently having done >>> the >>> job so often. >>> >>> So, forget loops and marks and other data as the issue is complicating >>> itself unnecessarily. >> It seems to me that this is the gist of your problem. >> Merging the mono files int ocorresponding stereo files >> is a triviality. Losing the loops and marks means >> you will _not_ have what you want anyway. >> >> Do you intend to process each and every of the 2000 resulting >> files manually in LoopAuditioner to recreate the loops? >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors >> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. >> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. >> Training and support from Colfax. >> Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi >> _______________________________________________ >> Sox-users mailing list >> Sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users >> > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors > Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. > With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. > Training and support from Colfax. > Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sox-users mailing list > Sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users >