From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C1FF1F990 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 09:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3bvF-0006Pf-5a; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:10:49 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3bvD-0006PR-U8 for sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:10:47 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version :Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=N3urWEEz5PJ+EpF9kiKzyOKSOP2aG8UVV50VG2mZy+4=; b=S/+WFzie8ip+eiB8ZGURqpRHiz MIS87QOiLfEqO5hacNsfBtYG7AGG8u6AR2fmKmQbBV8GEuTC+bHcWuWpgMbxNICrgb162QglxsEwh TCbhWS3o6hJwqS5bwQK7x0x88kLqJv5WtF8hsJKi6mCMhRxlTz8kJCyL/xzwpiwZu9fs=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=N3urWEEz5PJ+EpF9kiKzyOKSOP2aG8UVV50VG2mZy+4=; b=OgsJFAg4ui+OBQ/YJijE+aHmIG bfKPVvf7B+dv8NGOP26xclNvaeIrYw7T3MxtPjenr6XxZlRVKhKR4edhm4yaWrY050e4/qVaaX05G Mwja/Jgw96FRoIHrvLhA37XJc5tYWyE/TGVVduIgmmLm+uvXedt/JKqhGMwglG3GxR5c=; Received: from unicorn.mansr.com ([81.2.72.234]) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1k3bvC-00H98V-DV for sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:10:47 +0000 Received: from raven.mansr.com (raven.mansr.com [IPv6:2001:8b0:ca0d:8d8e::3]) by unicorn.mansr.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6855015360; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 10:10:31 +0100 (BST) Received: by raven.mansr.com (Postfix, from userid 51770) id 5D6FE21A6F2; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 10:10:31 +0100 (BST) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= To: sox-devel References: <1296948245.711083.1596655046178@mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 10:10:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1296948245.711083.1596655046178@mail.yahoo.com> (Wolfgang Stoeggl via SoX-devel's message of "Wed, 5 Aug 2020 19:17:26 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Headers-End: 1k3bvC-00H98V-DV Subject: Re: Bundled GSM library X-BeenThere: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: sox-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Wolfgang Stoeggl writes: > Dear M=E5ns , > > yes, libgsm available as package in many distributions, typically at > the current version of 1.0.19: > https://repology.org/project/gsm/versions > If a local copy is kept within sox, it should probably be updated ... Why not simply delete the local copy and save the maintenance burden? > As a small sign of being interested in keeping the cmake build system > for SoX, a patch for CMakeLists.txt is attached, which allows > detection of gsm.h, when it is directly in the include folder in > addition to detecting gsm/gsm.h so far. The patch also includes a fix > for detecting lame.h in addition to lame/lame.h Patches or not, do you have any compelling reason to keep the cmake system? I don't like it, and I certainly don't want to maintain it. -- = M=E5ns Rullg=E5rd _______________________________________________ SoX-devel mailing list SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel