From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS6130 216.105.38.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6D751F5A0 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 13:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=x header.b=bWPpdTdw; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=x header.b=VHpJ2BRu; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1pPO55-0001D6-1n; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 13:32:18 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1pPO53-0001Cn-27 for sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 13:32:16 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To: From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2AOXLUsud5JnDbvlLiGnDp5z5s5Sp0DTvzbvfmr1FCI=; b=bWPpdTdw+mAWJHvUR0e+Lx1no3 c/B2Zf5QVLfOcepIQ4UDAheRRt+uYqUhYZcIyuBMbszblvXrfTUS5BXl/05w3hdMEDkeD4J42eaUy FjZ0rFTzsNyOjRnUPykXjcg1M3G+dDpIPbi3bfV8Rcvbxl3y8GGl2SRFCr+cIR5jBPyI=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To :Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post: List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2AOXLUsud5JnDbvlLiGnDp5z5s5Sp0DTvzbvfmr1FCI=; b=V HpJ2BRuSld22j456FXnqSYNkM6CDY3eUMXe2UGTOueSKSb2qZEA8ScowHy78oVkMOcTmXBkZdHeWB tQJziy8ecGxSg9sdJZWhPdK72zHCOBAzEehq/pqUDrTpGV76gc2KFEzZBgB4NkKaQVnp/JmYtlDjC Dt+xHcRD+3KH5jac=; Received: from uvt.stare.cz ([185.63.96.79] helo=mx.stare.cz) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.95) id 1pPO4z-0002EV-0x for sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 13:32:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (stare.cz [local]) by stare.cz (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 1cbdcb3b for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 14:31:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 14:31:56 +0100 From: Jan Stary To: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Headers-End: 1pPO4z-0002EV-0x Subject: upstream and bugfixes X-BeenThere: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: sox-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Mans, just to clear it up for myself: https://sourceforge.net/p/sox/code/ci/master/tree/ is still the ultimate upstream, right? For reference: there is also https://github.com/cbagwell/sox (last commit 2015, 4 issues, 2 PRs) https://github.com/mansr/sox (forked, last 2017, 1PR, no issue tracker) (and a bunch of nobody's forks of these of course, such as mine). These can be ignored when packaging downstream, right? Are the commits in your GH fork included in the SF git? What is currently the right way to report bugs and propose fixes? Are diffs to this devel list the preffered way? The SF issues seem to be untouched for years. Last commit to the SF git is May 2021; where should current fixes such as https://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=167546008232629&w=2 be sent? Also, last release was 8 years ago. Piling the patches is starting to get cubersome when packaging downstream - are there any plans for a release? Jan _______________________________________________ SoX-devel mailing list SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel