I don't have any suggestions for how to get a patch accepted, but I will
say that I have written a VU meter effect (because I needed to write the
meter to a custom device) and found that the system is not that hard to
work with.  I believe that you will be well served to do your extension
here rather than in an in house tool.

All that being said, the traffic on this list is so low as to be dead.  I
am not certain that anyone is still doing official work, though I suspect
that someone is because I saw a release in the recent past.

Good luck, and let me know if I can be of assistance,
Claude

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 4:50 PM <manus@riseup.net> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> we (my colleagues and I) are in need of some Sox functionality with
> support for RF64 files and are thinking about adding proper (reading and
> writing) support for RF64 files to sox instead of extending our own
> in-house tool. Before diving in head-first, I wanted to ask around if
> there are some reasons for not doing this or pointers on how to do this,
> to make sure our patch will not be rejected.
> It seems to me libsndfile also supports writing RF64 files already?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Best,
> Manus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SoX-devel mailing list
> SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel
>


-- 
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren