From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pascal Giard Newsgroups: gmane.comp.audio.sox.devel Subject: off_t in gcc >= 4.6 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:50:49 -0400 Message-ID: Reply-To: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395931871 23672 80.91.229.3 (27 Mar 2014 14:51:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:51:11 +0000 (UTC) To: sox developers list Original-X-From: sox-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Thu Mar 27 15:51:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcasd-sox-devel@m.gmane.org Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.180; envelope-from=evilynux@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f180.google.com; X-Received: by 10.50.66.146 with SMTP id f18mr5025095igt.12.1395931869466; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:51:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (evilynux[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WTBeE-0000De-RQ X-BeenThere: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sox-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.audio.sox.devel:359 Archived-At: Received: from lists.sourceforge.net ([216.34.181.88]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WTBeL-000863-74 for gcasd-sox-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:51:21 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WTBeH-0007nd-R5; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:51:17 +0000 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WTBeG-0007nY-KM for SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:51:16 +0000 Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WTBeE-0000De-RQ for SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:51:16 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hl1so1674971igb.1 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.211.133 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:50:49 -0700 (PDT) Hi guys, derived into this this morning, thought this might affect SoX. tl;dr: A "newish" issue when attempting to use the old trick to detect if off_t needs to be forced to 64 bit (-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=3D64). http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22664658/finding-off-t-size -Pascal -- = Homepage (http://organact.mine.nu) Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org) COMunit=E9/LACIME: =C9cole de technologie sup=E9rieure (http://www.comunite= .ca) ISIP Laboratory: McGill (http://www.isip.ece.mcgill.ca) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---