From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E8CD1F66E for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBWPU-0005nA-4C; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:54:44 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBWPR-0005n2-Vr for sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:54:41 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=DMzw7ZyWDom7wMY68g0zlbXsA364ccVnX2is7DvacE4=; b=bZFkJ6kOVzXRtJs9OrH1fGPFEm DHHWaXsYcFPvPDYKYnqTyu1pLvccI9khs1e1FpJ/Mybc2tATAXnlcQ61WJocwo7Wt3ADL36PGoo0v FNszFuRvc7J66VM8ZxFrmgEWoOULA3thx2RoJ+P6RoyXfYMZfjNsHhgvH1Ar90znrAOQ=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=DMzw7ZyWDom7wMY68g0zlbXsA364ccVnX2is7DvacE4=; b=gmMvVIh//h3fnG4q1vsaT6DQ5q R8XEDLAWmvybo/fQQvd4J2hIsHTIsPI6pYMTsLUnfO1XwpmMI2DGaScLZMxMYTrYZEY5vdy+P4dfV tqC0KhEOfdcOwbCqbsZ4Jmu/k5JmpagxO9Rw++53RMBhdZCP9qO5uU6c0Mb3+2zHDhAk=; Received: from uvt.stare.cz ([185.63.96.79] helo=mx.stare.cz) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kBWPN-002yVg-W8 for sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:54:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (stare.cz [local]) by stare.cz (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 237b4676; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 06:54:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 06:54:24 +0200 From: Jan Stary To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Message-ID: <20200828045424.GA35535@www.stare.cz> References: <20200823215551.GA83582@www.stare.cz> <20200824065643.GA91434@www.stare.cz> <20200827094048.GC5768@www.stare.cz> <20200827130507.GA5432@www.stare.cz> <20200827174117.GA47934@www.stare.cz> <20200827191821.GA46515@www.stare.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200827191821.GA46515@www.stare.cz> X-Headers-End: 1kBWPN-002yVg-W8 Subject: Re: Build system cleanup X-BeenThere: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: sox-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Aug 27 21:18:21, hans@stare.cz wrote: > On Aug 27 19:50:52, mans@mansr.com wrote: > > Jan Stary writes: > > > > > However, having a patch in a build system that is not even expected > > > to apply cleanly is extremely fragile (beside being ugly). > > > It depends on the precise GNU libtool version; > > > > I'm perfectly happy to ignore it and let OpenBSD users deal with it > > however they please. The easiest way to deal with it I am aware of is "make LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool". Doing that is surely better than trying to patch the broken GNU libtool, as configure.ac currently does. > A simple and obvious solution is to set > LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool on OpenBSD, which > > 1. does not have the very bug that's causing the problem > 2. is native to the platform > > Don't you find it cleaner and more maintainable > than the current "patch" to the broken GNU libtool? > > No, really: don't you? _______________________________________________ SoX-devel mailing list SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel