From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99A51F66E for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBESj-0001Xn-BP; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:44:53 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBESi-0001Xc-4h for sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:44:52 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=hDKpai6eE7D2LvsFM11LYHcu7eq850DMNhNNRiJF7nQ=; b=l9jmzzEyoNykeLBBMnIkSa549i f4FQU3kg49z6I3pBhb8+Vd2ZfGmaFqxkCJe9cxUbyDGoof9ks5liFyCzGDrVCUxlPV3fc5sV7DOC7 g/Ga8Yq1ZLVtGDK1fbJfzYAhYrGud7bBrNGe3vj8O54dTKuUM4nWcOMt6WAPrInR9g/Q=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=hDKpai6eE7D2LvsFM11LYHcu7eq850DMNhNNRiJF7nQ=; b=Pk91n3y9lc5tDiczulKhU8TdBd l/jA01FvmirraBDW5pYUVAC0xDcsbBDMyr8pWKDsZYoRTCxHtcCLP/3gdCs5pHe9ztB+Au8weMPIt NpCDsVqIFtEREgBkZBLcXreKYVue5hTWNxFA7waYLF09Cj3+oQQGOyCMgS3WMddJUvnU=; Received: from uvt.stare.cz ([185.63.96.79] helo=mx.stare.cz) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kBESg-007d4b-GI for sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:44:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (stare.cz [local]) by stare.cz (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 8996962f; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:44:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:44:40 +0200 From: Jan Stary To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Message-ID: <20200827094440.GD5768@www.stare.cz> References: <20200822081738.GA14321@www.stare.cz> <20200822153545.GA61858@www.stare.cz> <20200823140733.GA9403@www.stare.cz> <20200823215551.GA83582@www.stare.cz> <20200824144314.GA45261@www.stare.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Headers-End: 1kBESg-007d4b-GI Subject: Re: Build system cleanup X-BeenThere: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: sox-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net > > Searching for -lsox in the -L path is also perfectly normal. > > As we now know, it is the order of the -L options > > introduced by GNU libtool that breaks it. > > > > Your "clean" VM is a special case in that it does not > > have a previous version installed (as opposed to my screwed up, > > misconfigured machine). When you install the previous sox 14.4.2 > > (pkg_add sox), does the > > > > ./configure CC=cc CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib > > make V=1 > > > > build still work? > > I assume it will break. Can you test please? > Yes, libtool should put the -L.libs before any other -L flags to avoid > such problems. Why don't you report the bug to them? People already did, nine years ago; choosing https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15471 as a random example. Wanna guess what GNU did about it? _______________________________________________ SoX-devel mailing list SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel