From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C1D51F66E for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAAWM-0006aq-Ke; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:20:14 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAAWL-0006aa-IT for sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:20:13 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Wb5RFwBbtcY+t6oyG4j3yXD6d9OLTAMSUAJXnkAsY2Q=; b=bsVuP3cygfNBECuX/GOPu8It7f WT/oegO6beHDzXJWS8bdigkJ8ejadDLDOA8zZKmePUuyLKuICN2Q+X47fHwlY4Qn5axV7gIPG8z8M pWby5CgfMPUmedihdclWQ0+wfQh7F/25wPmi3+J+mrQsCOOmq9Yp0EU2Hc06MuTU+IBI=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Wb5RFwBbtcY+t6oyG4j3yXD6d9OLTAMSUAJXnkAsY2Q=; b=TWzKRy4AVZ6mxAc8oI3t6bB3B4 sfY27DI+Y+yDySmbckUzR8SlNDCCfj0ERngGjYN/qBGUfZJlYNMWfTmh+xa1KdQOqRrJpW9ESochx Ifvck6pCdlFfmg+F0EISXBcUkeF3ayud1z8Vr1+bOsqsvXnXBldpz9lmADK2kQ+ZleJM=; Received: from uvt.stare.cz ([185.63.96.79] helo=mx.stare.cz) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kAAW6-00GzUM-Dx for sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:20:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (stare.cz [local]) by stare.cz (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 2d626155; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:19:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:19:46 +0200 From: Jan Stary To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Message-ID: <20200824111945.GA78441@www.stare.cz> References: <20200821204550.GA67586@www.stare.cz> <20200822081738.GA14321@www.stare.cz> <20200822153545.GA61858@www.stare.cz> <20200823140733.GA9403@www.stare.cz> <20200823194649.GA68664@www.stare.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Headers-End: 1kAAW6-00GzUM-Dx Subject: Re: Build system cleanup X-BeenThere: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: sox-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Aug 24 12:04:11, mans@mansr.com wrote: > Jan Stary writes: > > > We both know what it is: passing C_INCLUDE_PATH and LIBRARY_PATH > > into ./configure's environment produces a working link command; > > passing CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS to ./configure also used to produce > > a working command, but now produces a failing link line; > > the position of -L seems to be the difference. > > Both ways work fine on my OpenBSD system (clean install + lame etc). > There is no difference in behaviour between the master and new-build > branches. Can you please post the complete script(1) for each of env CC=cc C_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/local/include LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib \ ./configure make V=1 and ./configure CC=cc CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib make V=1 on both master and new-build? Because the difference between the two calls (which is, eventually, the difference between the ultimate link command) seems to be exactly the problem on my system. Jan _______________________________________________ SoX-devel mailing list SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel