From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07FEA1F66E for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9Vkj-00067n-EO; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:48:21 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9Vkh-00066z-Us for sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:48:19 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MTVOssQVfbdLtdk+LKyDH7Tw8a5x2VGSoaga78vqa04=; b=jOg2xD7JE/3N2erh7D4fMLYHab 295v4fQUp1ab3ha1afbpVCB+Eh4FAC8mIjlDEUqV1r+0FnZsa3moz/EYfRKGV4uNFcHDBJeOe/efj 8YwE3l//c5QFDQmRmQwCxmKqLkAKSXIb4L/vdHWwOZZTUS5hIhg2yDO6C79DZsSCx3Qo=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MTVOssQVfbdLtdk+LKyDH7Tw8a5x2VGSoaga78vqa04=; b=ZAVXgRaCEUhtb8/Pp1CmG3kUhM G/hrVkDGNf1YMEgPxv0al0TWadqxceCBdOdWkPnmgHcU1d19CUFGLQgA+74RTBAzFWEO9YHqjruDF hPRxlB6+DDo99CMND5nUR+7yxkF6YtnVq0r5Ge3RtFyH1cR2O5mhvkW3lx28ld/FgaZY=; Received: from uvt.stare.cz ([185.63.96.79] helo=mx.stare.cz) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1k9Vkg-003wLQ-KW for sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:48:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (stare.cz [local]) by stare.cz (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id d973ccf2; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 17:48:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 17:48:10 +0200 From: Jan Stary To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Message-ID: <20200822154810.GA64892@www.stare.cz> References: <20200821151610.GA82566@www.stare.cz> <20200821152130.GA6847@www.stare.cz> <20200821174358.GA88757@www.stare.cz> <20200821201758.GA23884@www.stare.cz> <20200821204550.GA67586@www.stare.cz> <20200822081738.GA14321@www.stare.cz> <20200822154328.GB61858@www.stare.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200822154328.GB61858@www.stare.cz> X-Headers-End: 1k9Vkg-003wLQ-KW Subject: Re: Build system cleanup X-BeenThere: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: sox-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Aug 22 17:43:28, hans@stare.cz wrote: > > > > Is it because of the _order_ of the -L options? > > Seems so: > > cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -fstack-protector-strong -Wl,--as-needed -o .libs/sox sox.o -L/usr/local/lib -L./.libs -lsox -lpng -lltdl -lao -lgsm -lid3tag -lz -lmad -lmp3lame -ltwolame -lopusfile -lopus -lsndio -lvorbisfile -lwavpack -lcrypto -lsndfile -lFLAC -lvorbisenc -lvorbis -logg -lm -Wl,-rpath,/home/hans/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib > > fails, but > > cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -fstack-protector-strong -Wl,--as-needed -o .libs/sox sox.o -L./.libs -lsox -L/usr/local/lib -lpng -lltdl -lao -lgsm -lid3tag -lz -lmad -lmp3lame -ltwolame -lopusfile -lopus -lsndio -lvorbisfile -lwavpack -lcrypto -lsndfile -lFLAC -lvorbisenc -lvorbis -logg -lm -Wl,-rpath,/home/hans/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib > > succeeds. The only difference between the two is the -L order, namely, > > cc [...] -o .libs/sox sox.o -L/usr/local/lib -L./.libs -lsox -lpng [...] > cc [...] -o .libs/sox sox.o -L./.libs -lsox -L/usr/local/lib -lpng [...] This (fail vs succeed) is the case for each of the following: OpenBSD clang version 10.0.1 egcc (GCC) 8.3.0 gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 _______________________________________________ SoX-devel mailing list SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel