From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E121F1F66E for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9VYq-0005Ez-Ef; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:36:04 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k9VYo-0005EV-Ak for sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:36:02 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=u9WWs4CE5rEMYnPJRqy9HmoZ+EY2JKfitYWt8u75WdY=; b=VjJ6niz7wS7BqYCPkQi9aSv80A wLTY1kacwc0Bti4iZuEHtkqVO7KM/5iFVxwoywPZeBEpicLZFFypehI/Q2RglmnANp/5HTCKqAnjH vDdIzgi1rT+PecaKlgqWoHfY52q0q8cfrFHTvbO27JrwC8rjacy2FETJQXDK/WJNAnLA=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=u9WWs4CE5rEMYnPJRqy9HmoZ+EY2JKfitYWt8u75WdY=; b=OLlgBPujUutkbM2p5J/n8GRTho 7Rfj0ld/81LyCHpRRRWJ8+vpXrD+876Z8+8FKT6uUfOa1U4SZpg1S7RisIBJNAyVSaKtNVA9IZLeF DKtfz70PDeY8XFrGRAgvRgnQrY+kIy1c2P4XkhNkaz46f5AbyPaOTkVlu4j6t9lnJ5mY=; Received: from uvt.stare.cz ([185.63.96.79] helo=mx.stare.cz) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1k9VYl-0016lG-Nn for sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:36:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (stare.cz [local]) by stare.cz (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id c7ecee8f; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 17:35:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 17:35:45 +0200 From: Jan Stary To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Message-ID: <20200822153545.GA61858@www.stare.cz> References: <20200821151610.GA82566@www.stare.cz> <20200821152130.GA6847@www.stare.cz> <20200821174358.GA88757@www.stare.cz> <20200821201758.GA23884@www.stare.cz> <20200821204550.GA67586@www.stare.cz> <20200822081738.GA14321@www.stare.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Headers-End: 1k9VYl-0016lG-Nn Subject: Re: Build system cleanup X-BeenThere: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: sox-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Aug 22 11:10:10, mans@mansr.com wrote: > Jan Stary writes: > > >> C_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/local/include > >> LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib > > > > I never used any of these. > > Are they docummented anywhere? > > Many compilers/linkers support such environment variables. The gcc > manual documents them here: > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Environment-Variables.html I am not using the gcc compiler. The default OpenBSD/amd64 compiler is clang. > These are the preferred method for indicating the location of libraries Where does this information come from? ./configure says something else. If the above is endeed preferrable (which I doubt), we have to fix configure to stop recommending something else than the recommended way. > since they augment the compiler's default search path without > interfering with command-line options which are searched first. In the same way, ./configure *FLAGS augment the compiler's path(s) without "interfering" with the environment - how is one preferable to the other? _______________________________________________ SoX-devel mailing list SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel