sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net unofficial mirror
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jan Stary <hans@stare.cz>
To: sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [SoX-users] how to interpret tell_off, and the right way to use sox_seek
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 09:50:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171107085036.GA34760@www.stare.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOphizK+rP8mPuDS8ZFz3J=GHXuYm4+P5WV0PrKOOrY+k3vyFg@mail.gmail.com>

> First, it reads (which presumably moves the file pointer forwards),
> then it seeks back to where it was.
> I've verified in gdb that it actually does call sox_seek() (again and
> again and again, but not forever).  I have also verified in gdb that
> it is reading the same samples.

Ah, I see what your problem is now.

> So sox_seek() is definitely being called, and definitely working.
> But nevertheless, the reading done after the seeking eventually fails.

Here is my slight rewrite of your example:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <err.h>
#include <sox.h>

int 
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
	sox_format_t *s;
	int32_t buf[1024];
	ssize_t r;
	int i;

	if (argc < 2)
		errx(1, "usage: ./soxseek input");
	if (sox_init() != SOX_SUCCESS)
		errx(1, "Cannot init libsox");
	if ((s = sox_open_read(*++argv, 0, 0, 0)) == NULL)
		errx(1, "Cannot open `%s'", *argv);
	for (i = 1; (r = sox_read(s, buf, 1024)) > 0; i++) {
		printf("[%04d] %zd samples, starting with %0x\n", i, r, *buf);
		if (sox_seek(s, 0, SOX_SEEK_SET) != SOX_SUCCESS)
			errx(1, "Cannot seek");
	}
	/* No way to test for sox_read() error */
	return 0;
}

(Note how I don't use sox_site_t for the sox_read() return value,
because it does not exist, eventhough that's what libsox(3) documents.)

$ sox -n /tmp/file.wav synth trim 0 $((1024 * 1000))s  
$ cc -o soxseek soxseek.c -lsox -I/usr/local/include/ -L/usr/local/lib
$ ./soxseek /tmp/file.wav 
[0000] 1024 samples, starting with 0
[0001] 1024 samples, starting with 0
[....]
[0999] 1024 samples, starting with 0
[1000] 1024 samples, starting with 0

So I think you are right. It does seek back to the begining of the sine wave
(thus reporting 0 as the first sample value in the buffer), but it gets
exhausted at EOF anyway. I suspect now it is a bug in sox_seek()
if we are calling it right.

> Certainly if you do analogous coding with calls to fread() and
> fseek(), it would not terminate.

Yes, the following will read the same file forever:

#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <err.h>

int 
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
	int fd;
	int32_t buf[1024];
	ssize_t r;
	int i;

	if (argc < 2)
		errx(1, "usage: ./seek input");
	if ((fd = open(*++argv, O_RDONLY)) == -1)
		err(1, NULL);
	for (i = 1; (r = read(fd, buf, 1024)) > 0; i++) {
		printf("[%04d] %zd samples, starting with %0x\n", i, r, *buf);
		if (lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET) == -1)
			err(1, NULL);
	}
	return (r != 0);
}


> What i'm trying to do now is to determine the correct way to use
> sox_seek() if i am using it incorrectly.  If i'm using it correctly,
> then i would like confirmation of my characterization (that it has
> some internal counter which is decremented until it hits zero).

I share your suspition now.

> (I did have a signal processing problem that i was considering
> earlier, but that's not relevant now because i avoided the sox_seek
> issue by rearranging the computation.  So i can do my dsp, but i do
> wonder about correct usage of sox_seek.)

Should we move this to sox-devel?

	Jan


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
SoX-devel mailing list
SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-07 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAOphizLnrajpe-7TGuxyp2pt8+_ZbVU9yc9oemNAtrybbRNqRw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20171106111001.GA80730@www.stare.cz>
     [not found]   ` <CAOphizKhERDQ-H_Xh0VSGPjKHnWBFgYc1UFQ7Ozk508WmDGTeg@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <20171106190645.GA61378@www.stare.cz>
     [not found]       ` <CAOphizLLcY6LX=q3SZk0MwGq9SMeutbmLkMrhWyPStxu79hMZQ@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]         ` <20171106210932.GA41280@www.stare.cz>
     [not found]           ` <CAOphizK+rP8mPuDS8ZFz3J=GHXuYm4+P5WV0PrKOOrY+k3vyFg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-11-07  8:50             ` [SoX-users] how to interpret tell_off, and the right way to use sox_seek Jan Stary
2017-11-07  8:50             ` Jan Stary [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171107085036.GA34760@www.stare.cz \
    --to=sox-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=sox-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/sox.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).