From: masaki.suketa@nifty•ne.jp
To: ruby-dev@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-dev:50312] [Ruby trunk Bug#14085] many redefinition warnings on test/win32ole/test_word.rb
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 11:30:55 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-67721.20171108113054.16c509a200242382@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-14085.20171106032111@ruby-lang.org
Issue #14085 has been updated by suke (Masaki Suketa).
#13984 で入れたんですけど、一旦、戻しましょうか。
WIN32OLEから定数を取得するときに、Wordサーバから複数回、同じ定数を返されるので、そうなるんですよね。
warningの対策は別で考えるとして。
----------------------------------------
Bug #14085: many redefinition warnings on test/win32ole/test_word.rb
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14085#change-67721
* Author: usa (Usaku NAKAMURA)
* Status: Assigned
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: suke (Masaki Suketa)
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.5.0dev (2017-11-06 trunk 60666) [x64-mswin64_100]
* Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
win32oleのテストで、以下のような警告が出ます。
警告が出るのは `WIN32OLE.const_load(w, Word)` というコードですが、
該当コードが複数回呼ばれているわけではなくて、これを1回呼ぶだけで、
定数の再定義が何度も行われてしまうようです。
実害はないような気もしますが、できれば出ないようにできないでしょうか？
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: already initialized constant Word::Emptyenum
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: previous definition of Emptyenum was here
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: already initialized constant Word::Emptyenum
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: previous definition of Emptyenum was here
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: already initialized constant Word::Emptyenum
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: previous definition of Emptyenum was here
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: already initialized constant Word::Emptyenum
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: previous definition of Emptyenum was here
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: already initialized constant Word::Emptyenum
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: previous definition of Emptyenum was here
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: already initialized constant Word::Emptyenum
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: previous definition of Emptyenum was here
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: already initialized constant Word::Emptyenum
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: previous definition of Emptyenum was here
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: already initialized constant Word::Emptyenum
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: previous definition of Emptyenum was here
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: already initialized constant Word::Emptyenum
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: previous definition of Emptyenum was here
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: already initialized constant Word::Emptyenum
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: previous definition of Emptyenum was here
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: already initialized constant Word::Emptyenum
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: previous definition of Emptyenum was here
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: already initialized constant Word::Emptyenum
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: previous definition of Emptyenum was here
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: already initialized constant Word::Emptyenum
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: previous definition of Emptyenum was here
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: already initialized constant Word::Emptyenum
D:/Users/usa/ruby/test/win32ole/test_word.rb:22: warning: previous definition of Emptyenum was here
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-08 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <redmine.issue-14085.20171106032111@ruby-lang.org>
2017-11-06 3:21 ` [ruby-dev:50311] [Ruby trunk Bug#14085] many redefinition warnings on test/win32ole/test_word.rb usa
2017-11-08 11:30 ` masaki.suketa [this message]
2017-11-08 11:40 ` [ruby-dev:50313] " usa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=redmine.journal-67721.20171108113054.16c509a200242382@ruby-lang.org \
--to=ruby-dev@ruby-lang.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).