ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: eregontp@gmail.com
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:97113] [Ruby master Feature#16153] eventually_frozen flag to gradually phase-in frozen strings
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 19:39:31 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-84219.20200210193931.11019@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-16153.20190909021526.11019@ruby-lang.org

Issue #16153 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).


Here is a POC PR by @byroot to implement this: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2872

----------------------------------------
Feature #16153: eventually_frozen flag to gradually phase-in frozen strings
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16153#change-84219

* Author: Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Freezing strings can give us a nice performance boost, but freezing previously non-frozen strings is a backward-incompatible change which is hard to handle because the place where the string is mutated can be far from where it was frozen, and tests might not cover the cases of frozen input vs non-frozen input.

I propose adding a flag which gives us a migration path for freezing strings. For purposes of discussion I will call this flag "eventually_frozen". It would act as a pseudo-frozen flag where mutating the object would result in a warning instead of an error. It would also change the return value of `Object#frozen?` so code like `obj = obj.dup if obj.frozen?` would work as expected to remove the warning. Note that eventually_frozen strings cannot be deduplicated, as they are in reality mutable.

This way it would be possible for Symbol#to_s (and many others) to return an eventually_frozen string in 2.7 which gives apps and gems time to migrate, before finally becoming a frozen deduplicated string in 3.0. This might even open up a migration path for eventually using `frozen_string_literal:true` as default. For example if it was possible to add `frozen_string_literal:eventual` to all files in a project (or as a global switch), we could run that in production to discover where to fix things, and then change it to `frozen_string_literal:true` for a bug-free performance boost.

### Proposed changes

* Object#freeze(immediately:true)
   * if `immediately` keyword is true, set frozen=true and eventually_frozen=false
   * if `immediately` keyword is false, set eventually_frozen=true UNLESS frozen flag is already true
* String#+@
   * if eventually_frozen is true, create a duplicate string with eventually_frozen=false
* Object#frozen?(immediately:false)
   * return true if `immediately` keyword is false and eventually_frozen flag is true
* rb_check_frozen
   * output warning if eventually_frozen flag is true

### Alternatively: the eventually_frozen flag is an internal detail only

* OBJ_EVENTUAL_FREEZE
   * used instead of OBJ_FREEZE in `rb_sym_to_s` and others to set eventually_frozen=true
* Object#freeze
   * set frozen=true and eventually_frozen=false
* String#+@
   * if eventually_frozen is true, create a duplicate string with eventually_frozen=false
* Object#frozen?
   * return true (or maybe `:eventually`) if eventually_frozen flag is true
* rb_check_frozen
   * output warning if eventually_frozen flag is true




-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

       reply	other threads:[~2020-02-10 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <redmine.issue-16153.20190909021526.11019@ruby-lang.org>
2020-02-10 19:39 ` eregontp [this message]
2024-03-19 20:47 ` [ruby-core:117238] [Ruby master Feature#16153] eventually_frozen flag to gradually phase-in frozen strings Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) via ruby-core

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.journal-84219.20200210193931.11019@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).