ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: eregontp@gmail.com
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:96855] [Ruby master Feature#15357] Proc#parameters returns incomplete type information
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 13:21:35 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-83865.20200114132135.aee73f27e13223ba@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-15357.20181128200114@ruby-lang.org

Issue #15357 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).


I agree, and discussed that a bit in #16499.

I think Proc#parameters should expose source-level information, not interpret it according to Kernel#lambda?.

----------------------------------------
Feature #15357: Proc#parameters returns incomplete type information
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15357#change-83865

* Author: larskanis (Lars Kanis)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Target version: 
----------------------------------------
The current implementation of Proc#parameters [differentiate between lambda? true and false](https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/49cd16bfaf4f03885058ce748119bc8ea2de735a/iseq.c#L2800).
This is presumably due to the fact, that [procs use tricks](https://ruby-doc.org/core-2.5.3/Proc.html#method-i-parameters) to apply arguments differently than lambda and methods.

Unfortunately `proc{}.parameters` states all `:req` parameters as `:opt`, so that these both types of parameters are not distinguishable. This information loss leads to the situation that two different proc signatures return an equal parameters list, but behave differently:

```ruby
pr = proc{|a,b=2| [a,b] }
pr.parameters  # => [[:opt, :a], [:opt, :b]]
pr.call(:a)    # => [:a, 2]  # :a is interpret as the first parameter

pr = proc{|a=1,b| [a,b] }
pr.parameters  # => [[:opt, :a], [:opt, :b]]
pr.call(:a)    # => [1, :a]  # :a is interpret as the second parameter
```

That means that the current return values of `proc{}.parameters` are not suitable to build wrapper or proxy objects for a proc. In Eventbox a workaround is used: The proc is passed to `define_method` and the [method parameters are retrieved instead](https://github.com/larskanis/eventbox/blob/3bcbc30096c6003e96d41c6496c781dfc90ac36a/lib/eventbox/argument_wrapper.rb#L10-L17). That way the list of parameters can be retrieved including `:req` and `:opt` differentiation, so that a wrapper proc can be built.

The application of argument assignment tricks is a property of the Proc object - not a property of single parameters. Therefore it shouldn't be applied to `Proc#parameters` in addition - at least not in a way that discards valuable information. The property of the Proc object is already readable through `Proc#lambda?`, so that there's no need to apply this property to `Proc#parameters` as well.

My proposal is to unify `proc{}.parameters` and `lambda{}.parameters`, so that `proc{}.parameters` shows positional arguments without default value as type `:req` as well.


---Files--------------------------------
proc-parameters-req-15357.patch (5.15 KB)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-14 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <redmine.issue-15357.20181128200114@ruby-lang.org>
2018-11-28 20:01 ` [ruby-core:90135] [Ruby trunk Bug#15357] Unify proc{} and lambda{}.parameters lars
2019-08-28  2:12 ` [ruby-core:94625] [Ruby master Feature#15357] Proc#parameters returns incomplete type information merch-redmine
2020-01-14 10:11 ` [ruby-core:96846] " lars
2020-01-14 13:21 ` eregontp [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.journal-83865.20200114132135.aee73f27e13223ba@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).