From: Greg.mpls@gmail.com
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:90264] [Ruby trunk Feature#15171] [patch] Use OpenSSL 1.1.1 for Appveyor MinGW build
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 14:18:55 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-75379.20181203141854.3e4b7a16e72e2d43@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-15171.20180927203651@ruby-lang.org
Issue #15171 has been updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
Sorry for the second message. I did not mention one thing that non Windows users may not be aware of.
Publicly facing Windows Ruby MinGW builds are all self contained. For instance, I locally test on Rubies from 2.2 thru trunk. Those five builds use four different sets of OpenSSL dll's. All that is required to change versions is a change to `ENV['PATH']`.
JFYI, due to that, building/compiling extension gems can be non-trivial.
----------------------------------------
Feature #15171: [patch] Use OpenSSL 1.1.1 for Appveyor MinGW build
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15171#change-75379
* Author: MSP-Greg (Greg L)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
@nobu
Thanks for your work with the Appveyor testing. It took three revisions, but MSYS2 has jumped from OpenSSL 1.0.2 to 1.1.1. The package release 1.1.1-4 should build fine on Appveyor MinGW. I don't think it has hit the MSYS2 repository yet, but certainly in the next 24 hours.
If you've got MSYS2 installed, `pacman -Ss mingw-w64-x86_64-openssl` should show availability. But you knew that.
Hence, line 122 of the current Appveyor.yml file would need mingw-w64-x86_64-openssl added to it. At present, Appveyor has got 1.0.2p.
Lastly, given any thought to moving the VC builds to Azure? I may see if I can make both VC12 and VC14 OpenSSL packages. Seems inappropriate to load different runtimes with (I think) VC12.
Greg
---Files--------------------------------
av_openssl_1.1.1.patch (2.09 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-03 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <redmine.issue-15171.20180927203651@ruby-lang.org>
2018-09-27 20:36 ` [ruby-core:89193] [Ruby trunk Feature#15171] OpenSSL soon available from MSYS2 Greg.mpls
2018-09-27 21:09 ` [ruby-core:89194] [Ruby trunk Feature#15171] OpenSSL 1.1.1 " naruse
2018-09-27 21:40 ` [ruby-core:89196] " Greg.mpls
2018-10-09 15:00 ` [ruby-core:89339] " jaruga
2018-10-09 15:35 ` [ruby-core:89341] " Greg.mpls
2018-10-09 17:36 ` [ruby-core:89343] " jaruga
2018-10-12 20:49 ` [ruby-core:89392] " Greg.mpls
2018-10-14 11:16 ` [ruby-core:89403] " jaruga
2018-10-14 14:35 ` [ruby-core:89404] " Greg.mpls
2018-10-15 11:47 ` [ruby-core:89405] " jaruga
2018-10-18 20:51 ` [ruby-core:89461] [Ruby trunk Feature#15171] [patch] Use OpenSSL 1.1.1 for Appveyor MinGW build Greg.mpls
2018-12-03 14:02 ` [ruby-core:90263] " Greg.mpls
2018-12-03 14:18 ` Greg.mpls [this message]
2019-08-18 6:55 ` [ruby-core:94414] [Ruby master " takashikkbn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=redmine.journal-75379.20181203141854.3e4b7a16e72e2d43@ruby-lang.org \
--to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).