From: matz@ruby-lang.org
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:85678] [Ruby trunk Feature#5123][Rejected] Alias Hash 1.9 as OrderedHash
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:19:09 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-70474.20180220081908.47b325990e23f573@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-5123.20110731161908@ruby-lang.org
Issue #5123 has been updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto).
Status changed from Assigned to Rejected
Today, everyone knows Ruby's Hash is a OrderedHash.
Matz.
----------------------------------------
Feature #5123: Alias Hash 1.9 as OrderedHash
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5123#change-70474
* Author: alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)
* Status: Rejected
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
I read that it was a controversial decision to make Hash in Ruby 1.9 ordered.
It is not clear if the present implementation is the best possible.
I would like to express my thought.
It would be nice if the ordered Hash in Ruby 1.9 was aliased as OrderedHash.
That way people who rely on preserving the insertion order in some application (me, for example) could explicitly use OrderedHash, and developers of Ruby would be free to redefine Hash in future versions if a better implementation that a doubly-linked circular list is found.
(I read something about a possibility of using "red–black tree".)
Thanks.
Alexey Muranov.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-20 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-31 7:19 [ruby-core:38623] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5123][Open] Alias Hash 1.9 as OrderedHash Alexey Muranov
2011-08-02 7:40 ` [ruby-core:38697] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5123][Assigned] " Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA
2011-08-02 7:54 ` [ruby-core:38698] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5123] " Michael Edgar
2011-08-03 1:29 ` [ruby-core:38732] " Thomas Sawyer
2011-08-03 7:02 ` [ruby-core:38740] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5123][Open] " Anurag Priyam
2011-08-06 22:23 ` [ruby-core:38827] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5123] " Alexey Muranov
2011-08-06 22:25 ` [ruby-core:38828] " Alexey Muranov
2012-10-27 15:00 ` [ruby-core:48483] [ruby-trunk " yhara (Yutaka HARA)
2012-10-31 20:09 ` [ruby-core:48680] " headius (Charles Nutter)
2012-10-31 20:29 ` [ruby-core:48683] " alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)
2012-11-22 1:47 ` [ruby-core:49847] " lancel (lancel lancel)
2012-11-22 6:29 ` [ruby-core:49863] " uggsoutlet (uggsoutlet uggsoutlet)
2015-12-19 11:43 ` [ruby-core:72376] [Ruby trunk " alexey.muranov
2018-02-20 8:19 ` matz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=redmine.journal-70474.20180220081908.47b325990e23f573@ruby-lang.org \
--to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).