ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: eregontp@gmail.com
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:84818] [Ruby trunk Feature#14344] refine at class level
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:05:25 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-69531.20180110180524.6959471ce3076d94@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-14344.20180109155454@ruby-lang.org

Issue #14344 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).


kddeisz (Kevin Deisz) wrote:
> Just to take a real example from my current application, here's a job (from Rails ActiveJob) that I want to refine by moving the logic into the class in which it belongs. It currently looks like this:

That's an interesting example indeed: using refinements to not pollute the model class but still make it convenient to write methods with the model as `self`.

To clarify my comment above: I'm not against a shorter way to define refinements+use them.
But #refine as proposed is wrong: if EventEndActionsJob was a module it would stop working because then
it would be the refine-just-define-refinements (current semantics) and not the refine-define-and-use-refinements you propose.

Or are you proposing to change the behavior of `refine do ... end` to always enable refinements after it until the end of the class/module body or the end of the file?
Then there would be a compatibility risk.

----------------------------------------
Feature #14344: refine at class level
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14344#change-69531

* Author: kddeisz (Kevin Deisz)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Target version: 
----------------------------------------
I rely on refinements a lot, but don't want to keep writing `Module.new` in code. I'm proposing `Object::refine`, which would create an anonymous module behind the scenes with equivalent functionality. So:

~~~ ruby
class Test
  using Module.new {
    refine String do
      def refined?
        true
      end
    end
  }
end
~~~

would become

~~~ ruby
class Test
  refine String do
    def refined?
      true
    end
  end
end
~~~

It's a small change, but reads a lot more clearly. Thoughts?



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-10 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <redmine.issue-14344.20180109155454@ruby-lang.org>
2018-01-09 15:54 ` [ruby-core:84778] [Ruby trunk Feature#14344] refine at class level kevin.deisz
2018-01-09 16:38 ` [ruby-core:84779] " shevegen
2018-01-09 17:13 ` [ruby-core:84780] " eregontp
2018-01-09 17:19 ` [ruby-core:84781] " kevin.deisz
2018-01-09 17:26 ` [ruby-core:84782] " eregontp
2018-01-09 17:31 ` [ruby-core:84783] " zverok.offline
2018-01-10 16:06 ` [ruby-core:84814] " kevin.deisz
2018-01-10 18:05 ` eregontp [this message]
2018-01-10 18:22 ` [ruby-core:84819] " kevin.deisz
2018-04-11 14:45 ` [ruby-core:86511] " kevin.deisz
2018-04-16 10:03 ` [ruby-core:86550] " eregontp
2018-04-17 15:38 ` [ruby-core:86561] " kevin.deisz
2019-01-02 22:41 ` [ruby-core:90864] " dementiev.vm
2019-01-11 11:05 ` [ruby-core:91018] " shevegen
2019-01-11 16:04 ` [ruby-core:91026] " dementiev.vm
2019-02-07  6:35 ` [ruby-core:91452] " matz
2019-02-07 21:13 ` [ruby-core:91482] " dementiev.vm
2019-02-07 22:14 ` [ruby-core:91483] " matz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.journal-69531.20180110180524.6959471ce3076d94@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).