From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Delivered-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Received: from kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.24]) by blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991E719E004C for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:06:28 +0900 (JST) Received: from voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.1.100]) by kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B375CB5D8FC for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:40:12 +0900 (JST) Received: from neon.ruby-lang.org (neon.ruby-lang.org [221.186.184.75]) by voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2820718CC7AF for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:40:13 +0900 (JST) Received: from [221.186.184.76] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167D4120614; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:40:11 +0900 (JST) X-Original-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Delivered-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Received: from o10.shared.sendgrid.net (o10.shared.sendgrid.net [173.193.132.135]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4B641205F9 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:40:06 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; h=from:to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id; s=smtpapi; bh=Q9r8U+gjBhu1G875iX6VX3QJ524=; b=g3z3aQ5m5fEdey7jOX O9FCMx+ww+CBo0tIfk3xwwdMirD9oSxlsJLgpoRuyYNUU5iugdliK1aZAobokTQJ 4hVGhyaq811tbfQTvR7FZIxF8jV40X7Wt7I2NtEei4jiqsal3Qf1heqXBswCOqBN gEaKgVm4DsRhy0AaVNBkyQPiA= Received: by filter0428p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0428p1mdw1.14981.56A1C0B112 2016-01-22 05:40:01.396499899 +0000 UTC Received: from herokuapp.com (ec2-54-167-155-241.compute-1.amazonaws.com [54.167.155.241]) by ismtpd0003p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id iH2AUoDHQjm3-BFHZ7ZlLg Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:40:01.307 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:40:01 +0000 From: steve.shreeve@gmail.com To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Redmine-MailingListIntegration-Message-Ids: 47730 X-Redmine-Project: ruby-trunk X-Redmine-Issue-Id: 12004 X-Redmine-Issue-Author: CoralineAda X-Redmine-Issue-Assignee: matz X-Redmine-Sender: shreeve X-Mailer: Redmine X-Redmine-Host: bugs.ruby-lang.org X-Redmine-Site: Ruby Issue Tracking System X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-SG-EID: ync6xU2WACa70kv/Ymy4QrNMhiuLXJG8OTL2vJD1yS6pHvj7TOcmDrx+B//psokkeaY+GgN/Bk4rT7 IT9sCXYjIzQ5860dX6geXs3cMGOfBZ+6RHe8PdeWtE7q6o5fGlJcfs0JFCxXbl6QpdxSCt6DinWVrl caLi2oqjvp1SD9hj3B4/yBFDJxsms89Mz81s2BpZwpyw9MDyEQawbU/OwQ== X-ML-Name: ruby-core X-Mail-Count: 73121 Subject: [ruby-core:73121] [Ruby trunk - Misc #12004] Code of Conduct X-BeenThere: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ruby developers List-Id: Ruby developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ruby-core-bounces@ruby-lang.org Sender: "ruby-core" Issue #12004 has been updated by Steve Shreeve. I agree wholeheartedly with Matz. There is no need for this CoC. These efforts to prevent "micro-agressions", etc. are absurd and childish. Ruby's community is great and has survived wonderfully for decades without this. These codes of conduct generally have the exact opposite of their intended effect. A desire for "diversity" and "acceptance of others" ends up with a rigid mindset against anyone that doesn't feel the same about some social issue. As F. A. Hayek so wisely stated, "Is there a greater tragedy imaginable than that, in our endeavour consciously to shape our future in accordance with high ideals, we should in fact unwittingly produce the very opposite of what we have been striving for?" Please, there is no need for this at all. ---------------------------------------- Misc #12004: Code of Conduct https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12004#change-56346 * Author: Coraline Ada Ehmke * Status: Assigned * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto ---------------------------------------- I am the creator of the Contributor Covenant, a code of conduct for Open Source projects. At last count there are over 13,000 projects on Github that have adopted it. This past year saw adoption of Contributor Covenant by a lot of very large, very visible projects, including Rails, Github's Atom text editor, Angular JS, bundler, curl, diaspora, discourse, Eclipse, rspec, shoes, and rvm. The bundler team made code of conduct integration an option in the gem creation workflow, putting it on par with license selection. Many open source language communities have already adopted the code of conduct, including Elixir, Mono, the .NET foundation, F#, and Apple's Swift. RubyTogether also adopted a policy to only fund Ruby projects that had a solid code of conduct in place. Right now in the PHP community there is a healthy debate about adopting the Contributor Covenant. Since it came from and has been so widely adopted by the Ruby community at large, I think it's time that we consider adopting it for the core Ruby language as well. Our community prides itself on niceness. What a code of conduct does is define what we mean by nice. It states clearly that we value openness, courtesy, and compassion. That we care about and want contributions from people who may be different from us. That we pledge to respect all contributors regardless of their race, gender, sexual orientation, or other factors. And it makes it clear that we are prepared to follow through on these values with action when and if an incident arises. I'm asking that we join with the larger Ruby community in supporting the adoption of the Contributor Covenant for the Ruby language. I think that this will be an important step forward and will ensure the continued welcoming and supportive environment around Ruby. You can read the full text of the Contributor Covenant at http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/3/0/ and learn more at http://contributor-covenant.org/. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to hearing your thoughts. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/