From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Delivered-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Received: from kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (smtp.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.24]) by blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AA519E0036 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 05:45:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.1.100]) by kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026EFB5D88B for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 06:17:32 +0900 (JST) Received: from neon.ruby-lang.org (neon.ruby-lang.org [221.186.184.75]) by voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A95C18CC7CC for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 06:17:32 +0900 (JST) Received: from [221.186.184.76] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E24A120577; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 06:17:31 +0900 (JST) X-Original-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Delivered-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Received: from o10.shared.sendgrid.net (o10.shared.sendgrid.net [173.193.132.135]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDC7D120571 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 06:17:20 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; h=from:to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id; s=smtpapi; bh=dQskzFejsj8lHONmbIOeM/7KGHc=; b=vvi+h7nlOpv2StA2uu k8vwRcSYitUQBISRlv3Wt21fH/3X9eijO6FWQ27AibJc6jlJNogQpUhpe1NaM2F5 aOk0knEv63jPlG5N/HnAx3XEEEytVSnXb3MfUhGxpsyqb36tDdBgTFbeYojjyjqF 27CH9laYhxlq6s8ED107iQVb0= Received: by filter0643p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0643p1mdw1.29037.5679BDDB5F 2015-12-22 21:17:15.961985469 +0000 UTC Received: from herokuapp.com (ec2-54-234-219-185.compute-1.amazonaws.com [54.234.219.185]) by ismtpd0004p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id BnoyIuAuSSKktUqimyCyeQ for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:17:15.987 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:17:15 +0000 From: nagachika00@gmail.com To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Redmine-MailingListIntegration-Message-Ids: 47045 X-Redmine-Project: ruby-trunk X-Redmine-Issue-Id: 11849 X-Redmine-Issue-Author: whitequark X-Redmine-Sender: nagachika X-Mailer: Redmine X-Redmine-Host: bugs.ruby-lang.org X-Redmine-Site: Ruby Issue Tracking System X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-SG-EID: ync6xU2WACa70kv/Ymy4QrNMhiuLXJG8OTL2vJD1yS7URStyBq9cVLYrMhYnCaMKVFlFY0/nKfT+IZ ljVyvCyAmrPSnOYJdWK0ZNvQjnQrh5xCiVokmUs2CoBybzVDeQib9qwHZ7nwOyU8OPRAw9fzVFWFsW qnr4gtpbOj6ZnF/Jdzoj8718U5OH/+aNTU1uPLJZQIgQTLYecO266t0Bew== X-ML-Name: ruby-core X-Mail-Count: 72443 Subject: [ruby-core:72443] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11849] Heredoc regression in 2.2.4 X-BeenThere: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ruby developers List-Id: Ruby developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ruby-core-bounces@ruby-lang.org Sender: "ruby-core" Issue #11849 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga. Backport changed from 2.0.0: DONTNEED, 2.1: DONTNEED, 2.2: REQUIRED to 2.0.0: DONTNEED, 2.1: DONTNEED, 2.2: DONE Backported into `ruby_2_2` branch at r53258. Are there any concrete gems which is affected by this regression? I want to know the severity of this issue in the real world. ---------------------------------------- Bug #11849: Heredoc regression in 2.2.4 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11849#change-55738 * Author: whitequark * * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * ruby -v: ruby 2.2.4p230 (2015-12-16 revision 53155) * Backport: 2.0.0: DONTNEED, 2.1: DONTNEED, 2.2: DONE ---------------------------------------- The following code gets rejected by 2.2.4: ~~~ruby { label:<<-DOC Some text for a heredoc goes here DOC } ~~~ However, it was valid in 2.2.3. I think this might have been introduced in r51617 (#10653). -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/