ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ruby-core:65179] [CommonRuby - Feature #10273] [Open] Immutable Ruby
       [not found] <redmine.issue-10273.20140921020419@ruby-lang.org>
@ 2014-09-21  2:04 ` a7145
  2015-07-09  5:12 ` [ruby-core:69913] [CommonRuby - Feature #10273] " 2851820660
  2016-07-27 19:17 ` [ruby-core:76590] [CommonRuby Feature#10273] " non.dmitriy
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: a7145 @ 2014-09-21  2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ruby-core

Issue #10273 has been reported by Atlas Prime.

----------------------------------------
Feature #10273: Immutable Ruby
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10273

* Author: Atlas Prime
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Category: 
* Target version: 
----------------------------------------
I watched Matz recent keynote about the future of Ruby. I wonder if Ruby can become an immutable language? That could be expedited by a port of Clojure's immutable types. Then add concurrency and distributed computing (perhaps modeled after Erlang). That surely would be a-ma-zing!

Yet, I am not sure how well OOP can mix with this. But if it can be figured out, I think it would be worth it --more than anything else I can conceive of for a Ruby 3.0. Of course, this is also a HUGE change.




-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [ruby-core:69913] [CommonRuby - Feature #10273] Immutable Ruby
       [not found] <redmine.issue-10273.20140921020419@ruby-lang.org>
  2014-09-21  2:04 ` [ruby-core:65179] [CommonRuby - Feature #10273] [Open] Immutable Ruby a7145
@ 2015-07-09  5:12 ` 2851820660
  2016-07-27 19:17 ` [ruby-core:76590] [CommonRuby Feature#10273] " non.dmitriy
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: 2851820660 @ 2015-07-09  5:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ruby-core

Issue #10273 has been updated by 11 22.


http://www.software-rating.com/
http://www.smartlogi.com/  
http://www.shareorder.com/  
http://www.gzs168.com/  
http://www.aimooimage.com/    
http://www.chinatowngate.net/

http://www.inspiredhypnosis.co.uk/daocplat.html
http://the303plan.com/tibiagoldforsale.html

----------------------------------------
Feature #10273: Immutable Ruby
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10273#change-53332

* Author: Atlas Prime
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
----------------------------------------
I watched Matz recent keynote about the future of Ruby. I wonder if Ruby can become an immutable language? That could be expedited by a port of Clojure's immutable types. Then add concurrency and distributed computing (perhaps modeled after Erlang). That surely would be a-ma-zing!

Yet, I am not sure how well OOP can mix with this. But if it can be figured out, I think it would be worth it --more than anything else I can conceive of for a Ruby 3.0. Of course, this is also a HUGE change.




-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [ruby-core:76590] [CommonRuby Feature#10273] Immutable Ruby
       [not found] <redmine.issue-10273.20140921020419@ruby-lang.org>
  2014-09-21  2:04 ` [ruby-core:65179] [CommonRuby - Feature #10273] [Open] Immutable Ruby a7145
  2015-07-09  5:12 ` [ruby-core:69913] [CommonRuby - Feature #10273] " 2851820660
@ 2016-07-27 19:17 ` non.dmitriy
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: non.dmitriy @ 2016-07-27 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ruby-core

Issue #10273 has been updated by Dmitriy Non.


I am sorry, it would be absolutely different programming language wouldn't it?


----------------------------------------
Feature #10273: Immutable Ruby
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10273#change-59814

* Author: Atlas Prime
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
----------------------------------------
I watched Matz recent keynote about the future of Ruby. I wonder if Ruby can become an immutable language? That could be expedited by a port of Clojure's immutable types. Then add concurrency and distributed computing (perhaps modeled after Erlang). That surely would be a-ma-zing!

Yet, I am not sure how well OOP can mix with this. But if it can be figured out, I think it would be worth it --more than anything else I can conceive of for a Ruby 3.0. Of course, this is also a HUGE change.




-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-28  0:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <redmine.issue-10273.20140921020419@ruby-lang.org>
2014-09-21  2:04 ` [ruby-core:65179] [CommonRuby - Feature #10273] [Open] Immutable Ruby a7145
2015-07-09  5:12 ` [ruby-core:69913] [CommonRuby - Feature #10273] " 2851820660
2016-07-27 19:17 ` [ruby-core:76590] [CommonRuby Feature#10273] " non.dmitriy

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).