From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Delivered-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Received: from kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.24]) by blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00211940BDF for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 01:04:10 +0900 (JST) Received: from funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.201]) by kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FACEB5D8C1 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 01:25:15 +0900 (JST) Received: from funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (localhost.nagaokaut.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E11B97A827 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 01:25:16 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nagaokaut.ac.jp Authentication-Results: funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=sendgrid.me Received: from funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b6x-k-KJUQmw for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 01:25:16 +0900 (JST) Received: from voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.1.100]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A6D97A826 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 01:25:16 +0900 (JST) Received: from neon.ruby-lang.org (neon.ruby-lang.org [221.186.184.75]) by voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EA595241E for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 01:25:13 +0900 (JST) Received: from [221.186.184.76] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0311E12040B; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 01:25:14 +0900 (JST) X-Original-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Delivered-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Received: from o10.shared.sendgrid.net (o10.shared.sendgrid.net [173.193.132.135]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0329F120036 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 01:25:08 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; h=from:to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id; s=smtpapi; bh=XsbIJyWs8IWFvgS+dOMF2z0DVPA=; b=Ku1B45vaPzy6j/Btnn xv9j2/rE6qpRWr06w+nJQp0aHIjVw0b9eNYP3cKlaOkeMQMvV8y2ZB+fYJxvHeAR 4UB0muJaR5Q+slN+CFHkae4lLkuDPXdCIMhyCcP8tOsNUnmZ5vynz1np5aQUFxGe pBqzKljl/QmQC1ENs1NJCPkuQ= Received: by filter0593p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0593p1mdw1.7646.557864DE19 2015-06-10 16:25:02.688604595 +0000 UTC Received: from herokuapp.com (ec2-54-146-202-156.compute-1.amazonaws.com [54.146.202.156]) by ismtpd-019 (SG) with ESMTP id 14dde4a058c.132f.4492ab for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:25:02 +0000 From: ko1@atdot.net To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Redmine-MailingListIntegration-Message-Ids: 44012 X-Redmine-Project: ruby-trunk X-Redmine-Issue-Id: 11246 X-Redmine-Issue-Author: ko1 X-Redmine-Issue-Assignee: shugo X-Redmine-Sender: ko1 X-Mailer: Redmine X-Redmine-Host: bugs.ruby-lang.org X-Redmine-Site: Ruby Issue Tracking System X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-SG-EID: ync6xU2WACa70kv/Ymy4QrNMhiuLXJG8OTL2vJD1yS6ImXKdvbOGmrkqPGP6l9hHE/xD29pOFUc0mB sZfzizdNmVYlYVH7+kMniESDGIPxkNy+L/9U1c65ZKBq0Xf8pSYPgnA9lginJ8s+8Fck8lKfRb0nRI p1QMYHcowSYanVpm5FFNrMu9ChbEMChMbwL4 X-ML-Name: ruby-core X-Mail-Count: 69517 Subject: [ruby-core:69517] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11246] refine block doesn't respect "lexical" refinement information X-BeenThere: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ruby developers List-Id: Ruby developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ruby-core-bounces@ruby-lang.org Sender: "ruby-core" Issue #11246 has been updated by Koichi Sasada. Description updated ---------------------------------------- Bug #11246: refine block doesn't respect "lexical" refinement information https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11246#change-52823 * Author: Koichi Sasada * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Shugo Maeda * ruby -v: ruby 2.3dev * Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- The following program making two refinements refine class C. ```ruby class C def foo p C end end module R1 refine C do def foo p R1 super end end end using R1 # 1 module R2 using R1 # 2 refine C do # using R1 # 3 def bar C.new.foo end end end using R2 C.new.bar ``` Without `using R1 # 3`, `C#foo` was called in `R2::C#bar`. By `using R1 #1` and `#2`, we declared that this lexical scope should use R1. However, it seems that this declaration is ignored. Is it an intentional behavior? -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/