From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Delivered-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Received: from kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.24]) by blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899DF17DE2DF for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:06:07 +0900 (JST) Received: from funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (smtp.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.201]) by kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDA0B5D88D for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:09:36 +0900 (JST) Received: from funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (localhost.nagaokaut.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD05497A82C for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:09:38 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nagaokaut.ac.jp Authentication-Results: funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=sendgrid.me Received: from funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SRTn4nSrejgx for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:09:38 +0900 (JST) Received: from voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.1.100]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AE697A820 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:09:38 +0900 (JST) Received: from neon.ruby-lang.org (neon.ruby-lang.org [221.186.184.75]) by voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8A3952408 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:09:35 +0900 (JST) Received: from [221.186.184.76] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732E81204A5; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:09:33 +0900 (JST) X-Original-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Delivered-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Received: from o10.shared.sendgrid.net (o10.shared.sendgrid.net [173.193.132.135]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E27712047C for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:09:30 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; h=from:to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id; s=smtpapi; bh=R2jSqnGoa/MAjo37J7lSY2M427w=; b=ILqhUxzvR1+iHy6kYi h8rwcCR7Zgrl722ausizIizq4B2/8cndcsICgTi33r+ExIcH88B+8d0yZDm9amtl Imq21O1qw+hP8IrHgMjqR5wg81Jd13GGqwdcKcgbWP26pQO4SgIkfMyP1ph1iCwU yn2MrLhuQnX8dAA8GM2sKvcmg= Received: by filter0238p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0238p1mdw1.16880.54E9F118A 2015-02-22 15:09:13.110405792 +0000 UTC Received: from herokuapp.com (ec2-54-161-58-170.compute-1.amazonaws.com [54.161.58.170]) by ismtpd-017 (SG) with ESMTP id 14bb1d5c80a.5357.60ecf5 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 15:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 15:09:12 +0000 From: ruby-core@marc-andre.ca To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Redmine-MailingListIntegration-Message-Ids: 42655 X-Redmine-Project: ruby-trunk X-Redmine-Issue-Id: 10880 X-Redmine-Issue-Author: sawa X-Redmine-Sender: marcandre X-Mailer: Redmine X-Redmine-Host: bugs.ruby-lang.org X-Redmine-Site: Ruby Issue Tracking System X-Auto-Response-Suppress: OOF Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-SG-EID: ync6xU2WACa70kv/Ymy4QrNMhiuLXJG8OTL2vJD1yS519UO19ur+Z8R8CWucZqBtolb0Xii3uYhTgE 55YQR7fTr8BopCQSvc8gxbOtqTOnGickyQluz6v7OYX4CuSmUrrlQw5XLTBK257WMOxl23793G/utM YQd5XdJqovGC/yM9aDwkefLCh7usDcpDFVdY X-ML-Name: ruby-core X-Mail-Count: 68227 Subject: [ruby-core:68227] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10880] Subclassing Array from Enumerator X-BeenThere: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ruby developers List-Id: Ruby developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ruby-core-bounces@ruby-lang.org Sender: "ruby-core" Issue #10880 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune. > I use with_index and with_object frequently. Any reason why you wouldn't simply use `each_with_index` and `each_with_object`? ---------------------------------------- Feature #10880: Subclassing Array from Enumerator https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10880#change-51589 * Author: Tsuyoshi Sawada * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- It often happens that I want to use a method from the `Enumerator` class on an array, and so I frequently use `Array#to_enum`. Since `Array` and `Enumerator` share the same parent `Enumerable`, they should be very close. I think it would be convenient if `Array` inherits from `Enumerator`. (Perhaps the same thing can be said for `Hash` too) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/