ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nobu@ruby-lang.org
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:64112] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10098] [PATCH] Timing-safe string comparison for OpenSSL::HMAC
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 05:26:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-48123.20140729052652.f1ffa7e26e52617a@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-10098.20140728145821@ruby-lang.org

Issue #10098 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.


Seems correct.

I made a benchmark for it:

~~~ruby
# bm-tsafe_eql.rb: [Feature #10098]

require 'benchmark'
a = "x"*1024_000
b = a+"y"
c = "y"+a
a << "x"
n = (ARGV.shift || 100000).to_i
Benchmark.bm(15) {|bm|
  bm.report("a==b") {n.times{a==b}}
  bm.report("a==c") {n.times{a==c}}
  bm.report("a.tsafe_eql?(b)") {n.times{a.tsafe_eql?(b)}}
  bm.report("a.tsafe_eql?(c)") {n.times{a.tsafe_eql?(c)}}
}
~~~

It seems quite slow.

               |      user|    system|     total|       real
---------------|----------|----------|----------|-----------
a==b           |  4.660000|  0.000000|  4.660000|(  4.672629)
a==c           |  0.010000|  0.000000|  0.010000|(  0.007154)
a.tsafe_eql?(b)| 34.330000|  0.020000| 34.350000|( 34.366759)
a.tsafe_eql?(c)| 34.450000|  0.020000| 34.470000|( 34.480267)

With the following patch,

               |      user|    system|     total|       real
---------------|----------|----------|----------|-----------
a==b           |  4.660000|  0.000000|  4.660000|(  4.666683)
a==c           |  0.000000|  0.000000|  0.000000|(  0.006657)
a.tsafe_eql?(b)|  7.660000|  0.010000|  7.670000|(  7.662584)
a.tsafe_eql?(c)|  7.660000|  0.000000|  7.660000|(  7.671189)

~~~ruby
diff --git a/string.c b/string.c
index 5c2852f..90865c0 100644
--- a/string.c
+++ b/string.c
@@ -2504,7 +2504,7 @@ static VALUE
 rb_str_tsafe_eql(VALUE str1, VALUE str2)
 {
     long len, idx;
-    char result;
+    VALUE result;
     const char *buf1, *buf2;
 
     str2 = StringValue(str2);
@@ -2516,7 +2516,13 @@ rb_str_tsafe_eql(VALUE str1, VALUE str2)
     buf2 = RSTRING_PTR(str2);
 
     result = 0;
-    for (idx = 0; idx < len; idx++) {
+    idx = 0;
+    if (UNALIGNED_WORD_ACCESS || !((VALUE)buf1 % sizeof(VALUE)) && !((VALUE)buf2 % sizeof(VALUE))) {
+	for (; idx < len; idx += sizeof(VALUE)) {
+	    result |= *(const VALUE *)(buf1+idx) ^ *(const VALUE *)(buf2+idx);
+	}
+    }
+    for (; idx < len; idx++) {
         result |= buf1[idx] ^ buf2[idx];
     }
 
~~~




----------------------------------------
Feature #10098: [PATCH] Timing-safe string comparison for OpenSSL::HMAC
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10098#change-48123

* Author: Matt U
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Category: ext/openssl
* Target version: next minor
----------------------------------------
I could be totally wrong, but it seems the standard library doesn't provide a reliable way of comparing hashes in constant-time.

* The docs for `OpenSSL::HMAC` encourage the use of `Digest#to_s` (see: http://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-2.1.0/libdoc/openssl/rdoc/OpenSSL/HMAC.html#method-c-new )
* Ruby's string comparison uses memcmp, which isn't timing safe (see: http://rxr.whitequark.org/mri/source/string.c#2382 )

With this patch I propose to add an additional method, `OpenSSL::HMAC#verify`, which takes a binary string with a digest and compares it against the computed hash.


---Files--------------------------------
hmac-timing.patch (2.5 KB)
hmac-timing.patch (2.48 KB)
tsafe_eql.patch (2.48 KB)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-29  5:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <redmine.issue-10098.20140728145821@ruby-lang.org>
2014-07-28 14:58 ` [ruby-core:64101] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10098] [Open] [PATCH] Timing-safe string comparison for OpenSSL::HMAC arrtchiu
2014-07-28 15:13 ` [ruby-core:64102] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10098] " arrtchiu
2014-07-29  1:25 ` [ruby-core:64106] " nobu
2014-07-29  1:39 ` [ruby-core:64107] " arrtchiu
2014-07-29  2:01 ` [ruby-core:64108] " nobu
2014-07-29  3:56 ` [ruby-core:64110] " arrtchiu
2014-07-29  5:26 ` nobu [this message]
2014-07-29  5:47 ` [ruby-core:64113] " nobu
2014-07-29  5:59 ` [ruby-core:64114] " arrtchiu
2014-07-29  7:35 ` [ruby-core:64115] " nobu
2014-07-29 10:30 ` [ruby-core:64118] " arrtchiu
2014-07-29 16:31 ` [ruby-core:64120] " nobu
2014-07-29 19:10 ` [ruby-core:64121] " cremno
2014-07-30  2:07 ` [ruby-core:64123] " arrtchiu
2014-07-30 12:56 ` [ruby-core:64125] " cremno
2014-08-23  9:12 ` [ruby-core:64508] " arrtchiu
2014-09-18  9:50 ` [ruby-core:65104] " arrtchiu
2014-10-29  8:52 ` [ruby-core:65988] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10098] [Assigned] " nagachika00
2015-09-13  3:31 ` [ruby-core:70792] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10098] " zzak
2016-02-06 17:28 ` [ruby-core:73724] [Ruby trunk Feature#10098] " aleksandrs
2016-02-25  6:42 ` [ruby-core:73970] " arrtchiu
2016-03-02  3:41 ` [ruby-core:74087] " naruse
2016-03-17  5:42 ` [ruby-core:74393] " shyouhei
2016-04-15 12:32 ` [ruby-core:74968] " naruse
2016-07-05  9:51 ` [ruby-core:76268] " arrtchiu
2016-09-07  8:55 ` [ruby-core:77201] [Ruby trunk Feature#10098][Feedback] " naruse
2016-09-27  9:07 ` [ruby-core:77423] [Ruby trunk Feature#10098] " shyouhei
2016-09-27 12:20 ` [ruby-core:77426] " aleksandrs
2016-09-27 12:44 ` [ruby-core:77427] " zn
2016-09-27 13:37 ` [ruby-core:77429] " nobu
2016-09-28  0:57 ` [ruby-core:77432] " shyouhei
2018-06-18  1:49 ` [ruby-core:87505] " shyouhei
2018-06-25 20:43 ` [ruby-core:87633] " bartdewater
2019-02-04 12:55 ` [ruby-core:91392] " shevegen
2019-02-07  7:40 ` [ruby-core:91459] " naruse
2019-08-18  5:17 ` [ruby-core:94409] [Ruby master " bartdewater
2019-10-20 18:21 ` [ruby-core:95440] " bartdewater
2019-10-21  2:09 ` [ruby-core:95447] " shyouhei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.journal-48123.20140729052652.f1ffa7e26e52617a@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).