ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "smcgivern (Sean McGivern) via ruby-core" <ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org>
To: ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
Cc: "smcgivern (Sean McGivern)" <ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org>
Subject: [ruby-core:113702] [Ruby master Misc#19122] Use MADV_DONTNEED instead of MADV_FREE when freeing a Fiber's stack
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 12:27:39 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-103348.20230530122739.48902@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-19122.20221111160608.48902@ruby-lang.org

Issue #19122 has been updated by smcgivern (Sean McGivern).


ioquatix (Samuel Williams) wrote in #note-5:
> If you want to use a specific mode (OS specific), you can do this:
> 
> On Linux, find the mode, e.g. `MADV_DONTNEED = 6` (https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/933174ae28ba72ab8de5b35cb7c98fc211235096/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/mman.h#L50).
> 
> Shift it one bit to the left (i.e. multiply by 2) `= 12`.
> 
> Then run Ruby like this:
> 
> ```
> > RUBY_SHARED_FIBER_POOL_FREE_STACKS=12 ruby
> ```

Thanks for adding this!
 
> As for making this the default, I suppose we could consider it but we'd need to confirm the performance impact. I would prefer to have high performance by default. RSS is a poor measurement IMHO. What about USS and PSS? Are they impacted the same way? Can we subtract the usage that can be later dropped?

I mean, as I said in the original description, this is the only part of Ruby that works this way, which makes it surprising. If usage of fibers becomes more common in the wild, or `MADV_FREE` gets used in other areas where Ruby frees memory, then I would predict more reports noting this behaviour. Other languages have reverted their usage of `MADV_FREE` for similar reasons.

We can construct another metric that gives us exactly what we want (for cAdvisor, we'd need something like https://github.com/google/cadvisor/issues/3197), but not through PSS or USS; both of those track RSS closely here, at least in my tests. We need to look at either `active_anon + inactive_anon` (for a cgroups `memory.stat` file), or `LazyFree` plus some other things I'm not sure about (for a process's `smaps_rollup`). This won't be the default in most monitoring tools, or in `top` et al, so as I said above, that wouldn't necessarily stop issues coming in.

----------------------------------------
Misc #19122: Use MADV_DONTNEED instead of MADV_FREE when freeing a Fiber's stack
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19122#change-103348

* Author: smcgivern (Sean McGivern)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: ioquatix (Samuel Williams)
----------------------------------------
I'd like to propose that Ruby stops using MADV_FREE when freeing a Fiber's stack, and switches to using MADV_DONTNEED even when MADV_FREE is supported.

MADV_FREE is used in one place in the Ruby codebase, when freeing the stack of a freed Fiber: https://git.ruby-lang.org/ruby.git/tree/cont.c#n683

The comment for `fiber_pool_stack_free` says:

```c
// We advise the operating system that the stack memory pages are no longer being used.
// This introduce some performance overhead but allows system to relaim memory when there is pressure.
```

Where possible (i.e. on Linux 4.5 and later), `fiber_pool_stack_free` uses `MADV_FREE` over `MADV_DONTNEED`. This has the side effect that memory statistics such as RSS will not reduce until and unless the OS actually reclaims that memory. If that doesn't happen, then the reported memory usage via RSS will be much higher than the 'real' memory usage.

If this was pervasive throughtout the Ruby codebase then that would be one thing, but currently this is just for Fiber. This means that:

1. A program that doesn't use Fiber will have somewhat reliable RSS statistics on recent Linux.
2. A program that heavily uses Fiber (such as something using Async::HTTP) will see an inflated RSS statistic.

Go made a similar change to the one I'm proposing here for similar reasons: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/42330

> While `MADV_FREE` is somewhat faster than `MADV_DONTNEED`, it doesn't affect many of the statistics that `MADV_DONTNEED` does until the memory is actually reclaimed. This generally leads to poor user experience, like confusing stats in `top` and other monitoring tools; and bad integration with management systems that respond to memory usage.
> [...]
> I propose we change the default to prefer `MADV_DONTNEED` over `MADV_FREE`, to favor user-friendliness and minimal surprise over performance. I think it's become clear that Linux's implementation of `MADV_FREE` ultimately doesn't meet our needs.

As an aside, MADV_FREE was not used in Ruby 3.1 (https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19101), and I haven't found any bugs filed about this behaviour other than that one.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
 ______________________________________________
 ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
 ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-30 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-11 16:06 [ruby-core:110708] [Ruby master Misc#19122] Use MADV_DONTNEED instead of MADV_FREE when freeing a Fiber's stack smcgivern (Sean McGivern)
2022-11-11 16:06 ` [ruby-core:110709] " smcgivern (Sean McGivern)
2022-11-21  4:18 ` [ruby-core:110830] " ioquatix (Samuel Williams)
2022-11-25 10:06 ` [ruby-core:111007] " smcgivern (Sean McGivern)
2023-05-24 15:08 ` [ruby-core:113630] " ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core
2023-05-25  2:07 ` [ruby-core:113652] " ioquatix (Samuel Williams) via ruby-core
2023-05-30 12:27 ` smcgivern (Sean McGivern) via ruby-core [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.journal-103348.20230530122739.48902@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    --cc=ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).