ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <noreply@ruby-lang.org>
To: ruby-core@neon.ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:110792] [Ruby master Feature#19036] Provide a way to set path for File instances created with for_fd
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 08:17:18 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.journal-100146.20221117081717.286@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-19036.20221002141803.286@ruby-lang.org

Issue #19036 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).


It seems okay for `File.for_fd(fd, path: ...)` but I'm not sure `IO.for_fd(fd, path: ...)`. Maybe it affects only `#inspect` because `IO#path` is not defined.

I think this functionality is also useful to label known IO such as:

```ruby
p STDERR
#=> #<IO:<STDERR>>

p IO.for_fd(STDERR.to_i)
#<IO:fd 2>

p IO.for_fd(STDERR.to_i, path: '<STDERR>')
#=> #<IO:<STDERR>>
```

`name` for strictly usage?


----------------------------------------
Feature #19036: Provide a way to set path for File instances created with for_fd
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19036#change-100146

* Author: headius (Charles Nutter)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Ruby provides `IO.for_fd` to instantiate an IO object from an existing file descriptor value. The logic for this simply calls the base `IO.new` logic, which for all IO and subtypes simply wraps the given file descriptor.

When called against File, or other subtypes of IO, this has the side effect of creating an IO instance with that type, e.g. `File.for_fd` will behave identically to `IO.for_fd` except that the class of the resulting object will be File.

Unfortunately, this results in a File object that does not have any `path` associated with it:

```
3.1.2 :001 > f = File.open('README.md')
 => #<File:README.md> 
3.1.2 :002 > f.path
 => "README.md" 
3.1.2 :003 > f2 = File.for_fd(f.fileno)
 => #<File:fd 5> 
3.1.2 :004 > f2.path
(irb):4:in `path': File is unnamed (TMPFILE?) (IOError)
        from (irb):4:in `<main>'                                
        from /home/headius/.rvm/rubies/ruby-3.1.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.1.0/gems/irb-1.4.1/exe/irb:11:in `<top (required)>'
        from /home/headius/.rvm/rubies/ruby-3.1.2/bin/irb:25:in `load'
        from /home/headius/.rvm/rubies/ruby-3.1.2/bin/irb:25:in `<main>'
```

I propose that there should be a way, via an extra parameter or a keyword argument, to provide a path when constructing a new File via `for_fd`.

Possible forms:

* `File.for_fd(fileno, "my/path")`
* `File.for_fd(fileno, path: "my/path")`

This would necessitate a separate implementation for `File.for_fd` unless we want to make it possible to set a path for all `for_fd` calls (which may not make sense for many of them).

This came up while trying to implement a pure-Ruby (plus FFI) version of the "pty" library. Without overriding the `path` function, it is not possible for the File object returned by `PTY.open` to gain the "masterpty:<slavename>" filename, and therefore it does not clearly indicate it is from a PTY.

See https://github.com/jruby/jruby/pull/7391, an attempt to match inspect output for these return values using `define_singleton_method`. Providing a way to set the path would make this automatic without the singleton definition.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

       reply	other threads:[~2022-11-17  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <redmine.issue-19036.20221002141803.286@ruby-lang.org>
2022-11-17  8:17 ` ko1 (Koichi Sasada) [this message]
2022-12-01  7:34 ` [ruby-core:111110] [Ruby master Feature#19036] Provide a way to set path for File instances created with for_fd ioquatix (Samuel Williams)
2022-12-01  8:33 ` [ruby-core:111119] " matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2022-12-08  5:22 ` [ruby-core:111238] " ioquatix (Samuel Williams)
2022-12-08 14:24 ` [ruby-core:111242] " Eregon (Benoit Daloze)
2022-12-09  8:50 ` [ruby-core:111244] " headius (Charles Nutter)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.journal-100146.20221117081717.286@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    --cc=ruby-core@neon.ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).