* [ruby-core:116044] [Ruby master Misc#20156] C99 updates
@ 2024-01-05 23:11 kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core
2024-01-06 10:54 ` [ruby-core:116053] " nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) via ruby-core
2024-01-08 14:59 ` [ruby-core:116070] " kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core @ 2024-01-05 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw
To: ruby-core; +Cc: kddnewton (Kevin Newton)
Issue #20156 has been reported by kddnewton (Kevin Newton).
----------------------------------------
Misc #20156: C99 updates
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20156
* Author: kddnewton (Kevin Newton)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Now that we require Visual Studio 2015 and Oracle Developer Studio 12.5, we can do a couple of things to clean up:
* We should be able to remove our custom `stdbool.h` (added in VS2015 and Oracle SS 12.3)
* Remove our usage of `__restrict` for Windows (added in VS2015)
* Remove our custom `va_copy` (added in VS2015)
Just notating, a couple of things that we _can_ use now:
* snprintf
* size_t printf format specifier (%z)
I'm happy to do this work, but I wanted to open this ticket in case there is something besides Visual Studio or Oracle Solaris Studio that I would have missed for one of our compilation targets. Are there any other targets that do not fully implement C99?
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
______________________________________________
ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [ruby-core:116053] [Ruby master Misc#20156] C99 updates
2024-01-05 23:11 [ruby-core:116044] [Ruby master Misc#20156] C99 updates kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core
@ 2024-01-06 10:54 ` nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) via ruby-core
2024-01-08 14:59 ` [ruby-core:116070] " kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) via ruby-core @ 2024-01-06 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: ruby-core; +Cc: nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
Issue #20156 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).
kddnewton (Kevin Newton) wrote:
> Now that we require Visual Studio 2015 and Oracle Developer Studio 12.5, we can do a couple of things to clean up:
>
> * We should be able to remove our custom `stdbool.h` (added in VS2015 and Oracle SS 12.3)
b75828fdfadaff6c5e09e42be32dff1216ed8fb1 says:
> Fix compile error with Oracle Solaris Studio 12.4 on Solaris 10.
No problem with Oracle SS 12.5?
> * Remove our usage of `__restrict` for Windows (added in VS2015)
`_MSC_VER` 1800 seems VS2013, so we might have been able to drop this condition already.
```C
!if $(MSC_VER) >= 1800
#define restrict __restrict
!else
#define restrict /* not supported */
!endif
```
> * Remove our custom `va_copy` (added in VS2015)
This is removed already?
> Just notating, a couple of things that we _can_ use now:
>
> * snprintf
We use our custom `snprintf` not only for old platforms, but also to avoid locales.
----------------------------------------
Misc #20156: C99 updates
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20156#change-106050
* Author: kddnewton (Kevin Newton)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Now that we require Visual Studio 2015 and Oracle Developer Studio 12.5, we can do a couple of things to clean up:
* We should be able to remove our custom `stdbool.h` (added in VS2015 and Oracle SS 12.3)
* Remove our usage of `__restrict` for Windows (added in VS2015)
* Remove our custom `va_copy` (added in VS2015)
Just notating, a couple of things that we _can_ use now:
* snprintf
* size_t printf format specifier (%z)
I'm happy to do this work, but I wanted to open this ticket in case there is something besides Visual Studio or Oracle Solaris Studio that I would have missed for one of our compilation targets. Are there any other targets that do not fully implement C99?
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
______________________________________________
ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [ruby-core:116070] [Ruby master Misc#20156] C99 updates
2024-01-05 23:11 [ruby-core:116044] [Ruby master Misc#20156] C99 updates kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core
2024-01-06 10:54 ` [ruby-core:116053] " nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) via ruby-core
@ 2024-01-08 14:59 ` kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core @ 2024-01-08 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw
To: ruby-core; +Cc: kddnewton (Kevin Newton)
Issue #20156 has been updated by kddnewton (Kevin Newton).
I was going based on https://github.com/ruby/ruby/wiki/C99-Usage-Guidelines. Maybe this documentation needs to be updated.
> b75828fdfadaff6c5e09e42be32dff1216ed8fb1 says:
>> Fix compile error with Oracle Solaris Studio 12.4 on Solaris 10.
> No problem with Oracle SS 12.5?
The title of that commit is `Support C89 if possible`. @ngoto was that necessary for actual C99 compilers or only to support old out-of-date compilers?
> _MSC_VER 1800 seems VS2013, so we might have been able to drop this condition already.
Yes I think this is true.
> We use our custom snprintf not only for old platforms, but also to avoid locales.
I see, thanks for the clarification.
----------------------------------------
Misc #20156: C99 updates
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20156#change-106068
* Author: kddnewton (Kevin Newton)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
Now that we require Visual Studio 2015 and Oracle Developer Studio 12.5, we can do a couple of things to clean up:
* We should be able to remove our custom `stdbool.h` (added in VS2015 and Oracle SS 12.3)
* Remove our usage of `__restrict` for Windows (added in VS2015)
* Remove our custom `va_copy` (added in VS2015)
Just notating, a couple of things that we _can_ use now:
* snprintf
* size_t printf format specifier (%z)
I'm happy to do this work, but I wanted to open this ticket in case there is something besides Visual Studio or Oracle Solaris Studio that I would have missed for one of our compilation targets. Are there any other targets that do not fully implement C99?
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
______________________________________________
ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org
ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-08 14:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-05 23:11 [ruby-core:116044] [Ruby master Misc#20156] C99 updates kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core
2024-01-06 10:54 ` [ruby-core:116053] " nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) via ruby-core
2024-01-08 14:59 ` [ruby-core:116070] " kddnewton (Kevin Newton) via ruby-core
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).