ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hi@olivierlacan.com
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:100521] [Ruby master Feature#17282] Deprecate Digest::SHA1
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 05:06:28 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.issue-17282.20201024050628.8088@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-17282.20201024050628.8088@ruby-lang.org

Issue #17282 has been reported by olivierlacan (Olivier Lacan).

----------------------------------------
Feature #17282: Deprecate Digest::SHA1
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17282

* Author: olivierlacan (Olivier Lacan)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
In light of the widespread deprecation of SHA1 due to collision risk it poses, should Ruby still expose it without a warning within Digest::SHA1? 

[FIPS PUB 180-1](https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/fips/180/1/archive/1995-04-17) which is referenced by the [Digest::SHA1 documentation](https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/master/Digest/SHA1.html) was withdraw on August 01, 2002, superseded by [FIPS 180-2](https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/fips/180/2/archive/2002-08-01) (which introduced SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512), and later withdrawn and superseded multiple times until [FIPS 180-4](https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/fips/180/4/final) which recommends SHA3. 

SHA3 isn't currently supported by the Digest class although there exists Ruby gem implementations: 
- https://github.com/johanns/sha3
- https://github.com/phusion/digest-sha3-ruby

References: 
- https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/Rp-inhYKT8A9H5E34iLTrc9I0gc/
- https://csrc.nist.gov/news/2017/research-results-on-sha-1-collisions
- https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-131a/rev-1/archive/2015-11-06
- https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-131a/rev-2/final

Quoting from NIST's piece on research regarding SHA1 collisions: 
> NIST deprecated the use of SHA-1 in 2011  and disallowed its use for digital signatures at the end of 2013, based on both the Wang, et. al, attack and the potential for brute-force attack.  To ensure that practitioners have secure and efficient hash algorithms to provide long-term security, NIST organized an international competition to select a new hash algorithm standard, SHA-3, which is specified in FIPS 202.

My recommendation would be to print a deprecation warning when Digest::SHA1 is used to alert Ruby users that they should perhaps upgrade to a safer standard. SHA3 should perhaps be supported by Digest as well.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

       reply	other threads:[~2020-10-24  5:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-24  5:06 hi [this message]
2020-10-24  5:34 ` [ruby-core:100522] [Ruby master Feature#17282] Deprecate Digest::SHA1 merch-redmine
2020-10-26  1:12 ` [ruby-core:100541] " shyouhei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.issue-17282.20201024050628.8088@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).