ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lourens@bearmetal.eu
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:95665] [Ruby master Misc#16291] Introduce support for resize in rb_ary_freeze and prefer internal use of rb_ary_freeze and rb_str_freeze for String and Array types
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 13:45:03 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.issue-16291.20191104134503.a0c3ad44d39f8ce9@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-16291.20191104134503@ruby-lang.org

Issue #16291 has been reported by methodmissing (Lourens Naudé).

----------------------------------------
Misc #16291: Introduce support for resize in rb_ary_freeze and prefer internal use of rb_ary_freeze and rb_str_freeze for String and Array types
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16291

* Author: methodmissing (Lourens Naudé)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
----------------------------------------
References Github PR https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2640

### Why?

While working on https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2037#issuecomment-548633141 I also looked at the `rb_ary_freeze` helper to determine if the same optimization of shrinking capacity can be applied there as well.

Further investigation revealed that `rb_str_freeze` attempts to resize / shrink strings on freeze, but we currently don't do the same for arrays despite API for it being exposed.

The gist of the change:

* Let `rb_ary_freeze` also attempt to right size an array before freezing it
* Replaced internal use of `rb_obj_freeze` and `OBJ_FREEZE` of callsites that pass a String or Array type in with `rb_ary_freeze` and `rb_str_freeze` specifically.

### Results

Saves about 3MB of Array and String specific heap footprints on a redmine production env boot on Rails 6 (custom local upgrade - it does not officially support it yet):

```
Loading production environment (Rails 6.1.0.alpha)
irb(main):001:0> RUBY_DESCRIPTION
=> "ruby 2.7.0dev (2019-11-02T06:32:49Z master 772b0613c5) [x86_64-linux]"
irb(main):002:0> require 'objspace'
=> true
irb(main):003:0> GC.start
=> nil
irb(main):004:0> ObjectSpace.each_object(Array).sum {|o| ObjectSpace.memsize_of(o) }
=> 4451200
irb(main):005:0> ObjectSpace.each_object(String).sum {|o| ObjectSpace.memsize_of(o) }
=> 8608472
irb(main):006:0> exit
```

```
Loading production environment (Rails 6.1.0.alpha)
irb(main):001:0> RUBY_DESCRIPTION
=> "ruby 2.7.0dev (2019-11-02T16:52:34Z obj-freeze-specifi.. 3bc4048899) [x86_64-linux]"
irb(main):002:0> require 'objspace'
=> true
irb(main):003:0> GC.start
=> nil
irb(main):004:0> ObjectSpace.each_object(Array).sum {|o| ObjectSpace.memsize_of(o) }
=> 3233432
irb(main):005:0> ObjectSpace.each_object(String).sum {|o| ObjectSpace.memsize_of(o) }
=> 6748422
```

irb - the best calculator ...

```
irb(main):002:0> (4451200 - 3233432) / 1024
=> 1189
irb(main):003:0> (8608472 - 6748422) / 1024
=> 1816
```

### Open questions

* Would it make sense to let `rb_obj_freeze` switch on object type instead and apply this optimization without "polluting" internals with custom callsite changes? Native extensions can then benefit from the resize feature too.
* HOWEVER: Discovered in testing that `rb_str_freeze` can fail asserts in `rb_str_tmp_frozen_release` when sprinkled too generously especially in `io.c`. And other issues may lurk too, thus incorporating the resizing in `rb_obj_freeze` won't work.  See https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2640#issuecomment-549119359

I think it could also make sense to split the PR in 2:

* One changeset for `rb_ary_freeze` attempting to resize Arrays on freeze, special case internal `rb_obj_freeze` of Arrays to prefer the new API
* Apply `rb_str_resize` at internal call sites where `rb_obj_freeze` is used with String types

Thoughts?



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

       reply	other threads:[~2019-11-04 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <redmine.issue-16291.20191104134503@ruby-lang.org>
2019-11-04 13:45 ` lourens [this message]
2019-11-05  1:49 ` [ruby-core:95684] [Ruby master Misc#16291] Introduce support for resize in rb_ary_freeze and prefer internal use of rb_ary_freeze and rb_str_freeze for String and Array types shyouhei
2019-11-08 22:31 ` [ruby-core:95765] " lourens
2019-12-26  2:24 ` [ruby-core:96479] [Ruby master Feature#16291] " mame
2019-12-31  6:43 ` [ruby-core:96606] " sam.saffron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.issue-16291.20191104134503.a0c3ad44d39f8ce9@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).