ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shugo@ruby-lang.org
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:73886] [Ruby trunk Bug#12086] using: option for instance_eval etc.
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:34:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.issue-12086.20160219073402.81f487c960c7103a@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-12086.20160219073402@ruby-lang.org

Issue #12086 has been reported by Shugo Maeda.

----------------------------------------
Bug #12086: using: option for instance_eval etc.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12086

* Author: Shugo Maeda
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* ruby -v: 
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN, 2.3: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Currently refinements can be activated only in toplevel or class/module definitions.
If they can be activated in block-level, it's useful to implement internal DSLs.

How about to add a new option using: for Kernel#instance_eval and Moule#{class,module}_eval?

```ruby
module FixnumDivExt
  refine Fixnum do
    def /(other)
      quo(other)
    end
  end
end

p 1 / 2 #=> 0
instance_eval(using: FixnumDivExt) do
  p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
p 1 / 2 #=> 0
```

Proof-of-concept implementation is available at <https://github.com/shugo/ruby/tree/eval_using>.

In my previous proposal before Ruby 2.0, refinements used in a class or module are
implicitly activated by instance_eval and class_eval, but now I think it's better to
explicitly specify refinements to be activated.

Considerations:

* In the PoC implementation, refined methods are not cached inline, and thus it decreases
  the performance of refined method call.
  If there is a way to guarantee that blocks never be evaluated in different environments,
  refined methods can be cached inline.
* {instance,class,module}_exec cannot be extended in the same way, because they take arbitrary
  arguments and there's no way to distinguish an option hash from the last argument hash.




-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

       reply	other threads:[~2016-02-19  6:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <redmine.issue-12086.20160219073402@ruby-lang.org>
2016-02-19  7:34 ` shugo [this message]
2016-02-19 10:01 ` [ruby-core:73887] [Ruby trunk Feature#12086] using: option for instance_eval etc shugo
2016-06-13  7:27 ` [ruby-core:75972] " nobu
2016-06-13  7:31 ` [ruby-core:75975] " matz
2016-07-08  7:56 ` [ruby-core:76316] " shugo
2016-07-08  8:02 ` [ruby-core:76317] " shugo
2016-07-08 12:58 ` [ruby-core:76320] " nobu
2016-07-09  0:17 ` [ruby-core:76326] " shugo
2016-07-20  2:42 ` [ruby-core:76463] " shyouhei
2016-09-07  8:10 ` [ruby-core:77196] " tom.enebo
2016-09-07 12:43 ` [ruby-core:77208] " headius
2016-09-07 13:59 ` [ruby-core:77209] " headius
2016-09-07 14:08 ` [ruby-core:77211] " headius
2016-09-07 14:22 ` [ruby-core:77212] " headius
2016-09-08 23:27 ` [ruby-core:77223] " shugo
2016-09-08 23:36 ` [ruby-core:77224] " shugo
2016-09-08 23:40 ` [ruby-core:77225] " shugo
2016-09-09  1:20 ` [ruby-core:77226] " headius
2016-09-09  3:08 ` [ruby-core:77227] " shugo
2019-12-29 19:46 ` [ruby-core:96583] [Ruby master " eregontp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=redmine.issue-12086.20160219073402.81f487c960c7103a@ruby-lang.org \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).