From: ko1@atdot.net
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:69425] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11203] [Open] Change method entries into VALUE
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 10:48:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <redmine.issue-11203.20150601104848.c6b33f12fb179e4c@ruby-lang.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: redmine.issue-11203.20150601104848@ruby-lang.org
Issue #11203 has been reported by Koichi Sasada.
----------------------------------------
Bug #11203: Change method entries into VALUE
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11203
* Author: Koichi Sasada
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* ruby -v:
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Now, rb_method_entry_t is an allocated data pointed from method tables (class/module has) and from control frame stacks.
I will change this data structure to make VALUE (T_IMEMO/ment).
And I put them onto value frames instead of control frame stacks.
This change has several advantages.
* Solve these issues.
* [Bug #11200] Memory leak of method entries
* [Bug #11046] __callee__ returns incorrect method name in orphan proc
* Simplify sweeping process of method entry
* We can remove rb_control_frame_t::me
* No need to push CREF for every method invocation. Method entries know required CREF.
* We can share per method CREF only for make them public visibility scope.
* We can introduce other optimization techniques.
* We can remove rb_control_frame_t::klass field because method entries can manipulate this information.
* We can introduce new method cache mechanism (maybe).
The following pictures show how SVAR/CREF/MENT are located at value stacks.
![before-value-stack](1.PNG)
![after-value-stack](2.PNG)
The following picture shows how alias was implemented.
![alias-relation](3.PNG)
---Files--------------------------------
1.PNG (46.6 KB)
2.PNG (43.4 KB)
3.png (31.8 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
next parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-01 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <redmine.issue-11203.20150601104848@ruby-lang.org>
2015-06-01 10:48 ` ko1 [this message]
2015-06-01 17:17 ` [ruby-core:69433] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11203] [Open] Change method entries into VALUE Eric Wong
2015-06-01 11:02 ` [ruby-core:69426] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11203] " nobu
2015-06-30 4:08 ` [ruby-core:69801] " usa
2015-07-02 0:14 ` [ruby-core:69834] " nagachika00
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=redmine.issue-11203.20150601104848.c6b33f12fb179e4c@ruby-lang.org \
--to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).