From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS4713 221.184.0.0/13 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from neon.ruby-lang.org (neon.ruby-lang.org [221.186.184.75]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E77B1F954 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neon.ruby-lang.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EEB120A21; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 22:16:38 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com (mail-wr1-f41.google.com [209.85.221.41]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB3D51209FC for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 22:16:31 +0900 (JST) Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id g1-v6so12980005wru.2 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 06:16:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=B1fREMpPkpEgJ1WnuyfJtQGHI5NPmRRM6UKFiJ+ojx0=; b=g0oziQKMXtl/jDUh7MH1GTMJRDtR7iMtnsG28W47GjUPoPg639u9Ry0R4T7ZEGabTn sw/3dat8/cpf0vprACvPWfLGqONqM70Id3PW90DsA+4b7jJzIrAzEwa00PjEywZOM8qm BotuGiv0OrbLG6c+YvLQulrQYyNO7mqsejxfMMMfqPyvAysSZNpRTOMqMYsQZOsYqYtM udWs+9d53ui5AWCOgO9xkDnHPE8cmug/ovNMaNLnW+ZCA2Fe4mkd0npItU08PiFPFWPy tIWlSjCcZi9O1jQE4omXHD3AkIie++EfX783Av2Rhad6csPZ0PICruq63CGd9Do6bLMK W3Lw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlH0LJ5MTCcp7syg8iQQ7rLXOjLk8BsPmfQXDyCDxZnKZxeWhhFh 7FT7OX5UkpuJXzApDb6t/Z1NxyfKYBKsOWMRXZDg1btz X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPyX3SdZfQO4LDUqfIvlwB4CuEvA9lJ6L2o/QIcOG8N61eVU8j5PttXcYwiMCaEnBpukddCI2qu7ZmjXgFnFD0c= X-Received: by 2002:adf:fb0e:: with SMTP id c14-v6mr29023265wrr.117.1534770987980; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 06:16:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180819132511.C15B66C028@svn.ruby-lang.org> <20180820081304.kylz5vcrkbt2657x@dcvr> In-Reply-To: <20180820081304.kylz5vcrkbt2657x@dcvr> From: Benoit Daloze Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 15:15:51 +0200 Message-ID: To: ruby-core X-ML-Name: ruby-core X-Mail-Count: 88569 Subject: [ruby-core:88569] Re: [ruby-cvs:71563] naruse:r64471 (trunk): don't run specs add at r64409 on Windows X-BeenThere: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ruby developers List-Id: Ruby developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ruby-core-bounces@ruby-lang.org Sender: "ruby-core" I think those specs are often spurious, but as far as I investigated, the whole WIN32OLE.new('Some.Application') is spurious (IIRC). So I'm not sure what we can do here. Maybe add more retries? See spec/ruby/library/win32ole/fixtures/classes.rb Anyway, I think this spec is unrelated, but it's fine to give it a try to see what happens. Please revert if it doesn't help. On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:13 AM Eric Wong wrote: > > naruse@ruby-lang.org wrote: > > don't run specs add at r64409 on Windows > > > > Maybe it breaks http://mswinci.japaneast.cloudapp.azure.com/vc12-x64/ruby-trunk/log/20180817T095734Z.fail.html.gz > > Maybe the host machine is in a bad state: > > "A system shutdown has already been scheduled." > > Perhaps it needs a reboot? > > Unsubscribe: >