[ruby-core:18497] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze

["Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@gmail.com>]

I think Trans' #source_location is nice.

I would prefer to rewrite this patch to become

RubyVM::InstructionSequence#source_location # or whatever name we use

And then also provide
Method#iseq
and
Proc#iseq
methods

To also provide the added capability of accessing Proc's iseq's [and
disassembling it, etc.--currently unavailable]

except I am having trouble creating Proc#iseq [Method#iseq is here[1]].

Any pointers on how to accomplish this? :)
Thanks for your help.
-=R
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-core-google/browse_thread/thread/932c0ea1078e294a


On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: [ruby-core:18490] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 feature freeze"
>    on Mon, 8 Sep 2008 18:05:05 +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> writes:
>
> |At Sun, 7 Sep 2008 04:53:43 +0900,
> |Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote in [ruby-core:18471]:
> |> This is a proposal to add __file__ and __line__ methods to Method and
> |> Proc objects.
>
> |I propose a new method, #location than those two new methods.
>
> I like the idea.  How others think?
>
>                                                        matz.
>
>



--
Thanks!
-=R



-- 
Thanks!
-=R