From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Delivered-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Received: from kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.24]) by blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id F405319E0019 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:16:52 +0900 (JST) Received: from voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.1.100]) by kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CB2B5D90D for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:48:40 +0900 (JST) Received: from neon.ruby-lang.org (neon.ruby-lang.org [221.186.184.75]) by voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA2E18CC7D1 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:48:41 +0900 (JST) Received: from [221.186.184.76] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8D5120477; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:48:39 +0900 (JST) X-Original-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Delivered-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Received: from sakura2.atdot.net (www4150ue.sakura.ne.jp [219.94.244.164]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AC1120460 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:48:35 +0900 (JST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sakura2.atdot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6509388041; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:48:33 +0900 (JST) To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org References: From: SASADA Koichi Message-ID: <566A2B71.4010708@atdot.net> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:48:33 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ML-Name: ruby-core X-Mail-Count: 72047 Subject: [ruby-core:72047] Re: Ruby 2.3.0-preview2 Released X-BeenThere: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ruby developers List-Id: Ruby developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ruby-core-bounces@ruby-lang.org Sender: "ruby-core" Please add your optimizations before RC1. (maybe Eric Wong wants to add) On 2015/12/11 10:40, NARUSE, Yui wrote: > Ruby 2.3 includes many performance tuning fixes. > For example, [optimize Proc#call] (https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11569), > [reconsider method entry data structure] > (https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11278), > [introducing new table data structure] > (https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11420), > machine code level tuning for object allocation and method calling code, > and other many optimizations. -- // SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net