ruby-core@ruby-lang.org archive (unofficial mirror)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>
To: Ruby developers <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: [ruby-core:81042] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip]
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 11:18:15 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a83bbeb-b22b-61ec-a03f-657746843431@atdot.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170508063633.GA6821@starla>

On 2017/05/08 15:36, Eric Wong wrote:
> Maybe; if we can avoid GVL and introduce more parallelism.
>
> However, I think having one epoll/kqueue FD is better for a
> whole process; maybe one epoll/kqueue per-core (not per-thread)
> at maximum.
>
> I can easily imagine Ruby doing 100 native threads in one process
> (8 cores, 10-20 rotational disks, 2 SSD), but 20000-30000 fibers.

could you elaborate more? 100 epoll threads are not effective?
Honestly, I have no experience to use epoll/kqueue.


# context switching to another topic

> Side note: First, I would like to make fibers smaller.
> Right now rb_fiber_t stores all of the rb_thread_t
> struct, but not all fields get used.  I started to work on
> splitting out to a new struct rb_thread_context_t earlier:
...
> The end goal is to avoid storing all of rb_thread_t inside
> rb_context_t/rb_fiber_t; and only store rb_thread_context_t.
> That should reduce memory overhead and maybe make switching
> faster.

This is what my goal of Ruby 2.5 (2017) I proposed to my company. If you
do it, it's great (and I achieved one of my job :)).

My plan is almost similar but I want to introduce something like
`mrb_state` which passed to all mruby functions as first argument.

Do you want to commit this patch before your final goal (lightweight
fiber switching)?


FYI: my plan.

(1) Make separate execution context and make fiber switching lightweight
  * before 2.5
  * You named `rb_thread_context_t`, but I don't want to name `thread`
    so I planned to name it `execution_context` and so on (a bit longer)
(2-1: extend Fiber) Add Fiber scheduler like you are thinking.
(2-2: toward Guild) Add `execution_context` as first argument to
    all C APIs
  * to keep compatibility, we need to introduce new prefix `rbX_...`
    for new APIs which receive first argument.
  * On mruby, `mrb_state` is passed to all of APIs. We need to consider
    the passed information carefully.

Thanks,
Koichi

-- 
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-09  1:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20170402011414.AEA9B64CEE@svn.ruby-lang.org>
     [not found] ` <8a2b82e3-dc07-1945-55f9-5a474e89130b@ruby-lang.org>
2017-04-02  2:35   ` [ruby-core:80531] Re: [ruby-cvs:65407] normal:r58236 (trunk): thread.c: comments on M:N threading [ci skip] Eric Wong
2017-04-02  3:05     ` [ruby-core:80532] " SASADA Koichi
2017-04-03  4:42       ` [ruby-core:80540] " Eric Wong
2017-05-08  0:33         ` [ruby-core:81027] " Eric Wong
2017-05-08  1:53           ` [ruby-core:81028] " SASADA Koichi
2017-05-08  2:16             ` [ruby-core:81029] " SASADA Koichi
2017-05-08  3:01               ` [ruby-core:81031] " Eric Wong
2017-05-08  3:42                 ` [ruby-core:81033] " SASADA Koichi
2017-05-08  6:36                   ` [ruby-core:81035] " Eric Wong
2017-05-09  2:18                     ` SASADA Koichi [this message]
2017-05-09  3:38                       ` [ruby-core:81044] " Eric Wong
2017-05-09  4:11                         ` [ruby-core:81045] " SASADA Koichi
2017-05-09  5:12                           ` [ruby-core:81047] " Eric Wong
2017-05-09  5:47                             ` [ruby-core:81049] " SASADA Koichi
2017-05-09  6:23                               ` [ruby-core:81053] " Eric Wong
2017-05-09  6:44                                 ` [ruby-core:81054] " SASADA Koichi
2017-05-09 18:51                                   ` [ruby-core:81078] " Eric Wong
2017-05-10  3:24                                     ` [ruby-core:81083] " SASADA Koichi
2017-05-10 10:04                                       ` [ruby-core:81089] " Eric Wong
2017-05-19  4:34                                         ` [ruby-core:81244] " Eric Wong
2017-06-20 19:16                                   ` [ruby-core:81733] " Eric Wong
2017-05-09  5:54                             ` [ruby-core:81050] " SASADA Koichi
2017-05-09  6:15                               ` [ruby-core:81052] " Eric Wong
2017-05-08  2:56             ` [ruby-core:81030] " Eric Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4a83bbeb-b22b-61ec-a03f-657746843431@atdot.net \
    --to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).