From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Delivered-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Received: from kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.24]) by blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCEE1F0378 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:06:33 +0900 (JST) Received: from funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.201]) by kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A86AC83A for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:05:01 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost.nagaokaut.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89198FC30 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:05:05 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp Received: from funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lDGQTVo3-itW for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:05:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.1.100]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C833E8FC22 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:05:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from carbon.ruby-lang.org (carbon.ruby-lang.org [221.186.184.68]) by voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5131A630092 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:05:04 +0900 (JST) Received: from beryllium.ruby-lang.org (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [127.0.0.1]) by carbon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DDB3C21EB67; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:04:50 +0900 (JST) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by carbon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649C43C21ED63 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:04:44 +0900 (JST) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so4309679ugc.16 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:04:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.132.2 with SMTP id f2mr3443142hud.37.1204891492136; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:04:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.100? ( [62.195.225.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 36sm4665499hub.16.2008.03.07.04.04.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:04:50 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:04:45 +0900 Posted: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:05:03 +0100 From: Hongli Lai Reply-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Subject: Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector Sender: Hongli Lai To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Message-Id: <47D12F6F.8080705@plan99.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-ML-Name: ruby-core X-Mail-Count: 15824 X-MLServer: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)]; post only (only members can post) X-ML-Info: If you have a question, send e-mail with the body "help" (without quotes) to the address ruby-core-ctl@ruby-lang.org; help= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on carbon.ruby-lang.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=7.0 tests=ARIN,AWL,BAYES_20, CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT,QENCPTR2,RIPE_NCC autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 X-Original-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=kbv5+KJoH+Op8dhOzdGghHulghTQt/eftasQGDBU8wM=; b=gr9hKZSXuP8v3uvBbp/2vCFuAfFpRNzmeLbhwSWpIGmC8+eaSSVdfwp6GMjcLPBFmE/uxCAWQ6yw7bM3Mu5TlcTRQqnAp+7qzDqUDbspYRM8AptHlHalY5cJw0VBl782srG2uugjGkWW4j/P47Q5cIfXjWd6StTMUpCRxnsLAIA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=MmXVCKIYdVwFdd6JMF8BWrKPY1LGU7IfwAfkWF5CYmRgOhqcgnQfQ8J4PB03qFMehM5d1HkLpYQEy0U4BTZttlaZdPexE9sHtQbaJLILpptVxqthWnkfZTuEizjDIRxi2U9FQ1Mqz0AkNFCRwGfYfjRTIJZUlwiLD6Vb1mkUyNY= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-Id: ruby-core.ruby-lang.org List-Software: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)] List-Post: List-Owner: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > Hi, > Here's the patch against the latest trunk (r15675). It's still 8-10% > slower than the current implementation. Hi. It's good to know that the patch isn't in limbo. :) But what is preventing it from being applied to trunk?