From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Delivered-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Received: from kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.24]) by blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B951F0371 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:01:38 +0900 (JST) Received: from funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.201]) by kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF7ACDAE for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:00:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost.nagaokaut.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4256C8FC5B for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:00:14 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp Received: from funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ASaXsoM0Kh3Q for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:00:14 +0900 (JST) Received: from voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.1.100]) by funfun.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224328FC57 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:00:14 +0900 (JST) Received: from carbon.ruby-lang.org (carbon.ruby-lang.org [221.186.184.68]) by voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED75663003F for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:00:12 +0900 (JST) Received: from beryllium.ruby-lang.org (beryllium.ruby-lang.org [127.0.0.1]) by carbon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F193C223A7C; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:59:19 +0900 (JST) Received: from smtp113.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp113.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.212]) by carbon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBC543C21D398 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:59:14 +0900 (JST) Received: (qmail 14008 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2008 05:59:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.20.20.11?) (layh@sbcglobal.net@70.255.141.83 with plain) by smtp113.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2008 05:59:07 -0000 Delivered-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:59:17 +0900 Posted: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:00:58 -0600 From: Charles Thornton Reply-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Subject: IRHG -- When GC is processing T_NODES -- Do they follow the VID's To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Message-Id: <47B3D91A.8000004@hawthorne-press.com> X-ML-Name: ruby-core X-Mail-Count: 15538 X-MLServer: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)]; post only (only members can post) X-ML-Info: If you have a question, send e-mail with the body "help" (without quotes) to the address ruby-core-ctl@ruby-lang.org; help= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070226 CentOS/1.0.8-0.2.el4.centos SeaMonkey/1.0.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on carbon.ruby-lang.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=7.0 tests=ARIN,BAYES_50, CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7 X-Original-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org X-YMail-OSG: OYiTKiUVM1nsfD51W9ny1JIIX4B.rB7VHnYEESpa2cVbth9X4VBnIIKm5XIJAmRnSOd7ULHGDQ-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-Id: ruby-core.ruby-lang.org List-Software: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)] List-Post: List-Owner: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: I have a question about T_NODE Processing in gc_mark_Children(). Is T_NODE and other Objects nodes processed separately? That is does processing trace VID's found in T_Nodes. Chuck T.