From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS4713 221.184.0.0/13 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from neon.ruby-lang.org (neon.ruby-lang.org [221.186.184.75]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551AE1F87F for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neon.ruby-lang.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B23121696; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 17:55:36 +0900 (JST) Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net (dcvr.yhbt.net [64.71.152.64]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35C3A121249 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 17:55:29 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288771F87F; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:55:26 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Message-ID: <20181122085526.GA30118@dcvr> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-ML-Name: ruby-core X-Mail-Count: 89963 Subject: [ruby-core:89963] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14968] [PATCH] io.c: make all pipes nonblocking by default X-BeenThere: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ruby developers List-Id: Ruby developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ruby-core-bounces@ruby-lang.org Sender: "ruby-core" ko1@atdot.net wrote: > Honestly speaking, we are not sure we can introduce it into > Ruby 2.6 (incompatibility, stability and so on). Understood, but all sockets in 1.8 relied on non-blocking I/O, too. Most scalability problems are focused on sockets, anyways. Maybe we can limit the non-blocking to only sockets if nonblocking pipes become a problem for some external process or libraries. I also haven't touched FIFO, yet... > So please commit it and let's try it. > If we find troubles we can't solve, we may revert them. OK r65922. Note: I am afk and offline much lately, so feel free to revert fully or partially (e.g. revert pipe-only).