From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS4713 221.184.0.0/13 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from neon.ruby-lang.org (neon.ruby-lang.org [221.186.184.75]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698801F406 for ; Thu, 10 May 2018 20:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neon.ruby-lang.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE9C1209EB; Fri, 11 May 2018 05:06:40 +0900 (JST) Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net (dcvr.yhbt.net [64.71.152.64]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FCA11209EB for ; Fri, 11 May 2018 05:06:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637DF1F406; Thu, 10 May 2018 20:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 20:06:32 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Message-ID: <20180510200632.GA3189@dcvr> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-ML-Name: ruby-core X-Mail-Count: 86972 Subject: [ruby-core:86972] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid X-BeenThere: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ruby developers List-Id: Ruby developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ruby-core-bounces@ruby-lang.org Sender: "ruby-core" samuel@oriontransfer.net wrote: > > Again, Mio (Glasgow Haskell Compiler) is most similar to what > > I'm working on, here, and that scales to some ridiculous number > > of cores > > Thanks for that I will read it. Fwiw, I've been citing Mio since before this feature was implemented... > I will assume you've implemented something similar, but I have > a question, when processing events, when handling events that > don't belong to the current thread, you put them in a queue. > How does the other thread know to wake up? It enqueues an interrupt for the target thread, same thing as "normal" thread switching. Ruby uses a 100ms timeslice with pthreads.