From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS4713 221.184.0.0/13 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from neon.ruby-lang.org (neon.ruby-lang.org [221.186.184.75]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1B3209FD for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 22:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neon.ruby-lang.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D751120721; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 07:58:00 +0900 (JST) Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net (dcvr.yhbt.net [64.71.152.64]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27D6D120719; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 07:57:57 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DD4209FD; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 22:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 22:57:54 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: ko1@ruby-lang.org, ruby-core@ruby-lang.org, ruby-cvs@ruby-lang.org Message-ID: <20170606225754.GA11480@dcvr> References: <20170606065854.7F44567833@svn.ruby-lang.org> <20170606184000.GA3503@starla> <20170606185849.GB3503@starla> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170606185849.GB3503@starla> X-ML-Name: ruby-core X-Mail-Count: 81596 Subject: [ruby-core:81596] Re: [ruby-cvs:66203] Re: Re: ko1:r59023 (trunk): revert r59020 because it may fail some tests sometimes on some environment (http://ci.rvm.jp/). This revert is to check the reason of failures. X-BeenThere: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ruby developers List-Id: Ruby developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ruby-core-bounces@ruby-lang.org Sender: "ruby-core" Eric Wong wrote: > Ah, r59020 interacts badly with r57422. I made r59028, now. However, I suspect our fd close notification is fragile and can be fixed further. I will continue investigating another time.