From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Delivered-To: poffice@blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp Received: from kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.24]) by blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD72D19C0015 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:33:48 +0900 (JST) Received: from voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.1.100]) by kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8FEB5D929 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:03:37 +0900 (JST) Received: from neon.ruby-lang.org (neon.ruby-lang.org [221.186.184.75]) by voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B0C18CC7D0 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:03:37 +0900 (JST) Received: from [221.186.184.76] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60D71204B3; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:03:35 +0900 (JST) X-Original-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Delivered-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net (dcvr.yhbt.net [64.71.152.64]) by neon.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2C4120486 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:03:31 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC4662031E; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 02:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 02:03:30 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Ruby developers Message-ID: <20151112020330.GA18224@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-ML-Name: ruby-core X-Mail-Count: 71459 Subject: [ruby-core:71459] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API X-BeenThere: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ruby developers List-Id: Ruby developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ruby-core-bounces@ruby-lang.org Sender: "ruby-core" matz@ruby-lang.org wrote: > I am OK with the change. I don't really like something like > __read_nonblock, but acceptable. OK, committed as r52541 for now. I don't have a better idea for hiding other than private + "__" prefix... Will followup with other IO/Socket/SSL methods