From: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:69995] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:01:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150716070142.GA11462@dcvr.yhbt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A72930.40305@atdot.net>
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
> On 2015/07/16 4:41, Eric Wong wrote:
> > normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
> >> Feature #11339: [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
> >> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11339
> >
> >> Note: I plan to followup commits for other *_nonblock methods
> >> Eventually, I even wish to deprecate rb_scan_args :D
> >>
> >> For what it's worth, I'm more excited about this change than usual
> >> and hope to use prelude.rb more.
> >
> > ko1/nobu/akr/others: any comments on this?
> >
> > My main concern is increased parse time from prelude during startup;
> > but we may translate prelude to iseq array and use rb_iseq_load, too.
> > The parser seems to be the worst offender for startup performance
> > nowadays.
>
> We have some ideas to solve this issue. We discussed about solutions.
>
> Known problems about C-methods parameters:
> (P1) slow to parse kwargs with Hash
> (P2) difficult to write scan_args
> (P3) C-methods can't support Method#parameters
Thank you for response.
> Solutions:
>
> (1) Introduce wrapping Ruby methods into prelude.rb (your idea)
> Pros. Easy to introduce.
> Solves (P1-3).
> Cons. Increase parse time at Ruby launch.
We cannot avoid parsing Ruby :) So I want to try to make parsing faster.
Unfortunately, my parser knowledge is not much right now.
> (2) Introduce new API to declare Ruby-like parameters for C-APIs
>
> like: rb_define_method(klass, "xyzzy", klass_xyzzy, -1)
>
> (2-1)
> -> rb_defnie_method_??(klass, "xyzzy", klass_xyzzy,
> "(m1, m2, o1=nil, o2=nil,
> *r, p1, p2, k1: 1, k2: 2)")
OK, I had the same idea like this, too.
But I do not want to introduce a new C API. IMHO, C API should be
smaller, not bigger.
> (3) Introduce new IDL (Interface Definition Language)
This may be OK... I don't see a big advantage over (1).
> (4) Introduce new IDL like Ricsin
>
> I made a system calls Ricsin, which enable to embed C code into Ruby code.
I think this is too ugly. One reason I like Ruby + (limited) C use is
relatively good separation between the different languages.
Working on C-ext is mostly normal C, and not some weird in-between
thing like Perl XS (gross!). Existing C programmers do not need to
learn a lot of new things to work with current CRuby.
I think it is important that we can use C tools (gdb, ctags, sparse,
etc...) can work without modification. But I still want to reduce C
and use more Ruby[1].
> I'm okay to introduce (1) because it is easy and practical.
OK, thank you. I will commit (1) this week and work on more prelude.rb
for other IO/Socket kwargs methods.
> If we can make (2)-(4), then we can replace from (1) to new mechanism.
> BTW, I'm working on making AOT compilation support (it will be continued
> to (3) or (4)). Recent rb_iseq_t changes were for this purpose. So that
> prelude.rb is nice benchmark for me.
I want to speed up Ruby parsing + startup in general, too.
Along the lines of AOT: I also consider having something like ccache
(self-managing size, only in $HOME, hashing-based) using rb_iseq_load.
I don't want to pollute users disk with too many compiled files; and it
should use hashing so we may tweak formats/architectures and not worry
about path conflicts with concurrently-installed Ruby versions.
We already have too many bug reports because C-exts/objs get shared.
[1] Fwiw, I like Rubinius philosophy a lot. However, the non-Free
contribution platform and eventual implementation
(slow startup time, "Ruby environment" vs being "another *nix tool"
which CRuby/Perl are) put me off.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-16 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <redmine.issue-11339.20150707215946@ruby-lang.org>
2015-07-07 21:59 ` [ruby-core:69892] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API normalperson
2015-07-15 19:41 ` [ruby-core:69983] " Eric Wong
2015-07-16 3:46 ` [ruby-core:69990] " SASADA Koichi
2015-07-16 7:01 ` Eric Wong [this message]
2015-07-16 9:17 ` [ruby-core:69999] " SASADA Koichi
2015-10-09 23:35 ` [ruby-core:71035] " Eric Wong
2015-11-10 22:27 ` [ruby-core:71435] " Eric Wong
2015-12-02 2:23 ` [ruby-core:71789] " Eric Wong
2015-11-11 5:20 ` [ruby-core:71439] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] " matz
2015-11-12 2:03 ` [ruby-core:71459] " Eric Wong
2015-11-12 9:53 ` [ruby-core:71462] " Eric Wong
2015-11-18 2:07 ` [ruby-core:71539] " Eric Wong
2015-11-13 4:18 ` [ruby-core:71473] " Eric Wong
2015-11-13 5:46 ` [ruby-core:71478] " SASADA Koichi
2015-11-13 7:03 ` [ruby-core:71479] " Eric Wong
2015-12-27 22:49 ` [ruby-core:72527] " headius
2015-12-27 23:00 ` [ruby-core:72528] " headius
2015-12-27 23:40 ` [ruby-core:72529] " Eric Wong
2015-12-28 0:13 ` [ruby-core:72530] " headius
2015-12-28 1:12 ` [ruby-core:72532] " Eric Wong
2015-12-28 0:22 ` [ruby-core:72531] " headius
2015-12-28 1:50 ` [ruby-core:72535] " headius
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/community/mailing-lists/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150716070142.GA11462@dcvr.yhbt.net \
--to=ruby-core@ruby-lang.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).