From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.2.24])
	by blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id AAA29303;
	Thu, 1 Aug 2002 00:03:06 +0900
Received: from tonton.nagaokaut.ac.jp (tonton [133.44.2.115])
	by kankan.nagaokaut.ac.jp (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g6VF3n133011;
	Thu, 1 Aug 2002 00:03:49 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from ruby-core-admin@ruby-lang.org)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by tonton.nagaokaut.ac.jp (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g6VF3nP73518;
	Thu, 1 Aug 2002 00:03:49 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from ruby-core-admin@ruby-lang.org)
Received: from voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp [133.44.1.100])
	by tonton.nagaokaut.ac.jp (8.11.3/8.11.3av) with ESMTP id g6VF3m573511;
	Thu, 1 Aug 2002 00:03:48 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from ruby-core-admin@ruby-lang.org)
Received: from helium.ruby-lang.org (helium.ruby-lang.org [210.251.121.214])
	by voscc.nagaokaut.ac.jp (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6VF3ja3095391;
	Thu, 1 Aug 2002 00:03:45 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from ruby-core-admin@ruby-lang.org)
Received: from helium.ruby-lang.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by helium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 202C1162B; Thu,  1 Aug 2002 00:03:47 +0900 (JST)
Received: from moulon.inra.fr (moulon.inra.fr [138.102.114.1])
	by helium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235DC1626
	for <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org>; Thu,  1 Aug 2002 00:03:44 +0900 (JST)
Received: from moulon.inra.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by moulon.inra.fr (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g6VEwa704701
	for <ruby-core@ruby-lang.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:58:36 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from decoux@localhost)
	by moulon.inra.fr (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g6VEwat04696;
	Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:58:36 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 00:03:46 +0900
Posted: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:58:36 +0200 (MET DST)
From: ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr>
Reply-To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: Re: A truth? patch  + benchmarks
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Cc: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Message-Id: <200207311458.g6VEwat04696@moulon.inra.fr>
In-Reply-To: <000001c238a0$d32538f0$0100a8c0@lony> (chr_news@gmx.net)
References:  <000001c238a0$d32538f0$0100a8c0@lony>
X-ML-Name: ruby-core
X-Mail-Count: 00280
X-MLServer: fml [fml 3.0pl#17]; post only (only members can post)
X-ML-Info: If you have a question, send e-mail with the body
	"help" (without quotes) to the address ruby-core-ctl@ruby-lang.org;
	help=<mailto:ruby-core-ctl@ruby-lang.org?body=help>
Precedence: bulk
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10

>>>>> "C" == Christoph  <chr_news@gmx.net> writes:

C> I also cooked up simple minded an implementation. It is based on
C> a FL_FALSE flag (I defined it to be 1<<5 not sure if this can
C> case any problem?) similar to the frozen or tainted flags - that
C> is I added there methods (the method names ain't great ..)

 Not really sure but the values < 64 reserved for T_MASK

#define T_NIL    0x01
#define T_OBJECT 0x02
[etc]
#define T_NODE   0x3f

#define T_MASK   0x3f


Guy Decoux