From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lamia.local (dslb-094-216-093-113.pools.arcor-ip.net [94.216.93.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm15648365fkr.30.2009.08.03.15.25.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lamia.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 89793B061FD; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 00:25:50 +0200 (CEST) To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Rack 1.0.1 maintenance release References: From: Christian Neukirchen Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:25:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Joshua Peek's message of "Mon\, 3 Aug 2009 10\:36\:19 -0700 \(PDT\)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii [Sorry for being rather inactive lately, my real life is too busy. ;)] Joshua Peek writes: > I'd like to do a 1.0.1 maintenance soon of the rack-1.0 branch. Please > test your apps and frameworks on that branch. It should be a fully > compatible bug fix release. This is a good idea. When you consider it ready, I can write an announcement and do a formal release on Rubyforge and my servers. > I went though most of the Lighthouse tickets and only found one that > really concerned 1.0. > > "Rack::Utils.unescape problems in Ruby 1.9.1" > http://rack.lighthouseapp.com/projects/22435/tickets/48-rackutilsunescape-problems-in-ruby-191 > > http://rack.lighthouseapp.com/projects/22435-rack/milestones/current > > Please reassign any 1.1 milestones tickets to 1.0 or let me know of > anything else master that you'd liked cherry-picked into rack-1.0. > > Looking forward to Rack 1.1. I'm open for Rack 1.1 suggestions. 1.1-discussed things can be merged into master now. I have more time to do a release cycle in the next few weeks, so if we merge quickly, we can push a 1.1 pretty soon. blink, do you still want to split the openid parts? 1.1 would be a good juncture. Thanks to everyone, -- Christian Neukirchen http://chneukirchen.org