From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lamia.local (p5B16A676.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.22.166.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j6sm56579602mue.31.2009.08.05.12.36.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:36:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lamia.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id D2716B091D4; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:36:33 +0200 (CEST) To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Rack 1.0.1 maintenance release References: <1c5622660908031843j1aca35f1r96deb03143db0f4c@mail.gmail.com> From: Christian Neukirchen Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:36:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1c5622660908031843j1aca35f1r96deb03143db0f4c@mail.gmail.com> (Joshua Peek's message of "Mon\, 3 Aug 2009 20\:43\:06 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joshua Peek writes: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Christian > Neukirchen wrote: >> I'm open for Rack 1.1 suggestions. =C2=A01.1-discussed things can be mer= ged >> into master now. >> >> I have more time to do a release cycle in the next few weeks, so if we >> merge quickly, we can push a 1.1 pretty soon. > > For 1.1, I want to pull parts of Bryan Helmkamp's Rack::Test lib into > core. Its been proven and widely accepted by many frameworks so far. I > want to start a separate thread for this and we can discuss whats > important, what belongs in core, etc. 1.1 will give us a chance to > improve Rack's testing support. > > http://github.com/brynary/rack-test/ LGTM --=20 Christian Neukirchen http://chneukirchen.org