* Re: Rack 1.0.1 maintenance release
2009-08-03 22:25 ` Christian Neukirchen
@ 2009-08-04 1:43 ` Joshua Peek
2009-08-05 19:36 ` Christian Neukirchen
2009-08-04 4:16 ` Joshua Peek
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Peek @ 2009-08-04 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rack-devel
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Christian
Neukirchen<chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm open for Rack 1.1 suggestions. 1.1-discussed things can be merged
> into master now.
>
> I have more time to do a release cycle in the next few weeks, so if we
> merge quickly, we can push a 1.1 pretty soon.
For 1.1, I want to pull parts of Bryan Helmkamp's Rack::Test lib into
core. Its been proven and widely accepted by many frameworks so far. I
want to start a separate thread for this and we can discuss whats
important, what belongs in core, etc. 1.1 will give us a chance to
improve Rack's testing support.
http://github.com/brynary/rack-test/
--
Joshua Peek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: Rack 1.0.1 maintenance release
2009-08-04 1:43 ` Joshua Peek
@ 2009-08-05 19:36 ` Christian Neukirchen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Christian Neukirchen @ 2009-08-05 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rack-devel
Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Christian
> Neukirchen<chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm open for Rack 1.1 suggestions. 1.1-discussed things can be merged
>> into master now.
>>
>> I have more time to do a release cycle in the next few weeks, so if we
>> merge quickly, we can push a 1.1 pretty soon.
>
> For 1.1, I want to pull parts of Bryan Helmkamp's Rack::Test lib into
> core. Its been proven and widely accepted by many frameworks so far. I
> want to start a separate thread for this and we can discuss whats
> important, what belongs in core, etc. 1.1 will give us a chance to
> improve Rack's testing support.
>
> http://github.com/brynary/rack-test/
LGTM
--
Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Rack 1.0.1 maintenance release
2009-08-03 22:25 ` Christian Neukirchen
2009-08-04 1:43 ` Joshua Peek
@ 2009-08-04 4:16 ` Joshua Peek
2009-08-05 2:22 ` Joshua Peek
2009-10-05 20:14 ` Scytrin dai Kinthra
3 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Peek @ 2009-08-04 4:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rack-devel
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Christian
Neukirchen<chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to do a 1.0.1 maintenance soon of the rack-1.0 branch. Please
>> test your apps and frameworks on that branch. It should be a fully
>> compatible bug fix release.
>
> This is a good idea. When you consider it ready, I can write an
> announcement and do a formal release on Rubyforge and my servers.
Can anyone report any failures on 1.9? I have some that are related to
a ruby regression (in 1.9.1-p152).
http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/browse_thread/thread/a2aab3a4720f34c4
Also, I'm trying to contact some people atm to setup a rack CI server for us.
--
Joshua Peek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Rack 1.0.1 maintenance release
2009-08-03 22:25 ` Christian Neukirchen
2009-08-04 1:43 ` Joshua Peek
2009-08-04 4:16 ` Joshua Peek
@ 2009-08-05 2:22 ` Joshua Peek
2009-08-09 7:50 ` Ryan Tomayko
2009-10-05 20:14 ` Scytrin dai Kinthra
3 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Peek @ 2009-08-05 2:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rack-devel
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Christian
Neukirchen<chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to do a 1.0.1 maintenance soon of the rack-1.0 branch. Please
>> test your apps and frameworks on that branch. It should be a fully
>> compatible bug fix release.
>
> This is a good idea. When you consider it ready, I can write an
> announcement and do a formal release on Rubyforge and my servers.
Rails 2.3 is all systems go w/ rack 1.0.1.
Should wait on Ryan to test w/ Sinatra.
--
Joshua Peek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Rack 1.0.1 maintenance release
2009-08-05 2:22 ` Joshua Peek
@ 2009-08-09 7:50 ` Ryan Tomayko
2009-10-05 17:15 ` Joshua Peek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Tomayko @ 2009-08-09 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rack-devel
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Joshua Peek<josh@joshpeek.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Christian
> Neukirchen<chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'd like to do a 1.0.1 maintenance soon of the rack-1.0 branch. Please
>>> test your apps and frameworks on that branch. It should be a fully
>>> compatible bug fix release.
>>
>> This is a good idea. When you consider it ready, I can write an
>> announcement and do a formal release on Rubyforge and my servers.
>
> Rails 2.3 is all systems go w/ rack 1.0.1.
>
> Should wait on Ryan to test w/ Sinatra.
Sorry. I'm way behind on ML/lighthouse duties.
Sinatra looks good under the rack-1.0 branch. +1 for release.
The Sinatra test suite fails like crazy under 1.9 due to this
rack.input / external encoding Rack::Lint check:
http://github.com/rack/rack/commit/851782648fbbb141b1b56b73d8efc99efcac1b27#L0R240
The Sinatra test suite puts Rack::Lint in the middleware pipeline for
every test, though. I don't think that's a common practice. It passes
100% when I remove that check. The issue seems to be with the way
Rack::MockRequest wraps the :input string in an StringIO without any
encoding work. Or, maybe we should be setting the encoding on the
input string before passing it in. I should be able to work around
this in Sinatra somehow.
Thanks,
Ryan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Rack 1.0.1 maintenance release
2009-08-09 7:50 ` Ryan Tomayko
@ 2009-10-05 17:15 ` Joshua Peek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Peek @ 2009-10-05 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rack Development
Please!
On Aug 9, 2:50 am, Ryan Tomayko <r...@tomayko.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Joshua Peek<j...@joshpeek.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Christian
> > Neukirchen<chneukirc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> I'd like to do a 1.0.1 maintenance soon of the rack-1.0 branch. Please
> >>> test your apps and frameworks on that branch. It should be a fully
> >>> compatible bug fix release.
>
> >> This is a good idea. When you consider it ready, I can write an
> >> announcement and do a formal release on Rubyforge and my servers.
>
> > Rails 2.3 is all systems go w/ rack 1.0.1.
>
> > Should wait on Ryan to test w/ Sinatra.
>
> Sorry. I'm way behind on ML/lighthouse duties.
>
> Sinatra looks good under the rack-1.0 branch. +1 for release.
>
> The Sinatra test suite fails like crazy under 1.9 due to this
> rack.input / external encoding Rack::Lint check:
>
> http://github.com/rack/rack/commit/851782648fbbb141b1b56b73d8efc99efc...
>
> The Sinatra test suite puts Rack::Lint in the middleware pipeline for
> every test, though. I don't think that's a common practice. It passes
> 100% when I remove that check. The issue seems to be with the way
> Rack::MockRequest wraps the :input string in an StringIO without any
> encoding work. Or, maybe we should be setting the encoding on the
> input string before passing it in. I should be able to work around
> this in Sinatra somehow.
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Rack 1.0.1 maintenance release
2009-08-03 22:25 ` Christian Neukirchen
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-05 2:22 ` Joshua Peek
@ 2009-10-05 20:14 ` Scytrin dai Kinthra
2009-10-06 14:06 ` Christian Neukirchen
3 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Scytrin dai Kinthra @ 2009-10-05 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rack-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1234 bytes --]
Moving the openid stuff into rack-contrib for 1.1 sounds good. I am on a
vacation till the end of next week so as soon as I finish some personal
things I can do the migrations.
Additionally, as memcached ruby gem seems to be more stable with 0.17, I
plan on evaluating using that rather the memcache-client, unless there are
any objections.
--
stadik.net
On Aug 3, 2009 4:00 PM, "Christian Neukirchen" <chneukirchen@gmail.com>
wrote:
[Sorry for being rather inactive lately, my real life is too busy. ;)]
Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com> writes: > I'd like to do a 1.0.1 maintenance
soon of the rack-1.0 ...
This is a good idea. When you consider it ready, I can write an
announcement and do a formal release on Rubyforge and my servers.
> I went though most of the Lighthouse tickets and only found one that >
really concerned 1.0. > > ...
I'm open for Rack 1.1 suggestions. 1.1-discussed things can be merged
into master now.
I have more time to do a release cycle in the next few weeks, so if we
merge quickly, we can push a 1.1 pretty soon.
blink, do you still want to split the openid parts? 1.1 would be a
good juncture.
Thanks to everyone,
--
Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1768 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: Rack 1.0.1 maintenance release
2009-10-05 20:14 ` Scytrin dai Kinthra
@ 2009-10-06 14:06 ` Christian Neukirchen
2009-10-06 14:18 ` James Tucker
2009-10-14 5:49 ` Quin Hoxie
0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Christian Neukirchen @ 2009-10-06 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rack-devel
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Scytrin dai Kinthra <scytrin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moving the openid stuff into rack-contrib for 1.1 sounds good. I am on a
> vacation till the end of next week so as soon as I finish some personal
> things I can do the migrations.
>
> Additionally, as memcached ruby gem seems to be more stable with 0.17, I
> plan on evaluating using that rather the memcache-client, unless there are
> any objections.
Alright!
Ok, everyone cherry-pick fixes for 1.0.1, and I can make a release
this week (Thu or Fri).
--
Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Rack 1.0.1 maintenance release
2009-10-06 14:06 ` Christian Neukirchen
@ 2009-10-06 14:18 ` James Tucker
2009-10-06 14:27 ` Christian Neukirchen
2009-10-14 5:49 ` Quin Hoxie
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: James Tucker @ 2009-10-06 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rack-devel
On 6 Oct 2009, at 15:06, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Scytrin dai Kinthra <scytrin@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>> Moving the openid stuff into rack-contrib for 1.1 sounds good. I am
>> on a
>> vacation till the end of next week so as soon as I finish some
>> personal
>> things I can do the migrations.
>>
>> Additionally, as memcached ruby gem seems to be more stable with
>> 0.17, I
>> plan on evaluating using that rather the memcache-client, unless
>> there are
>> any objections.
>
> Alright!
>
> Ok, everyone cherry-pick fixes for 1.0.1, and I can make a release
> this week (Thu or Fri).
to rack-1.0?
>
> --
> Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> http://
> chneukirchen.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Rack 1.0.1 maintenance release
2009-10-06 14:06 ` Christian Neukirchen
2009-10-06 14:18 ` James Tucker
@ 2009-10-14 5:49 ` Quin Hoxie
2009-10-16 20:30 ` Christian Neukirchen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Quin Hoxie @ 2009-10-14 5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rack Development
Curious if there is an updated ETA on the release?
On Oct 6, 7:06 am, Christian Neukirchen <chneukirc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Scytrin dai Kinthra <scyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Moving the openid stuff into rack-contrib for 1.1 sounds good. I am on a
> > vacation till the end of next week so as soon as I finish some personal
> > things I can do the migrations.
>
> > Additionally, as memcached ruby gem seems to be more stable with 0.17, I
> > plan on evaluating using that rather the memcache-client, unless there are
> > any objections.
>
> Alright!
>
> Ok, everyone cherry-pick fixes for 1.0.1, and I can make a release
> this week (Thu or Fri).
>
> --
> Christian Neukirchen <chneukirc...@gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread