From: David LaMacchia <dml@copious.com>
To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com
Subject: .eql? returns false on identity comparison of Tempfiles
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 10:05:00 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f19ec3dd-85ea-4111-a610-b3182fae85c9@googlegroups.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1792 bytes --]
I ran into an unusual problem (rails 3.1.3, rack 1.3.6) while using
rack-multipart_related
(https://github.com/lucasfais/rack-multipart_related) as middleware to
handle parsing of a multipart containing an image. While parsing the POST
request, there's the following code in rack/request.rb:
def POST
if @env["rack.input"].nil?
raise "Missing rack.input"
elsif @env["rack.request.form_input"].eql? @env["rack.input"]
@env["rack.request.form_hash"]
elsif form_data? || parseable_data?
I noticed that if the size of the image was small, a StringIO is created
containing the request data and as expected,
@env["rack.request.form_input"].eql? @env["rack.input"]
returns true. Both operands point to the same StringIO, the object_id's
are the same.
If the image being uploaded was larger, a Tempfile seems to be created for
the input and I get a weird result in this same piece of code:
(rdb:1) p @env["rack.request.form_input"]
#<File:/var/folders/_c/0c66qtcm8xjcns006s6bhgzr0000gn/T/thin-body20120604-68121-12dpbf1>
(rdb:1) p @env["rack.request.form_input"].class
Tempfile
(rdb:1) p @env["rack.request.form_input"].object_id
70289039522540
(rdb:1) p @env["rack.input"]
#<File:/var/folders/_c/0c66qtcm8xjcns006s6bhgzr0000gn/T/thin-body20120604-68121-12dpbf1>
(rdb:1) p @env["rack.input"].object_id
70289039522540
(rdb:1) p @env["rack.request.form_input"] == @env["rack.input"]
true
(rdb:1) p @env["rack.request.form_input"].eql?(@env["rack.input"])
false
So, == returns that the operands, which are the same Tempfile, are
equivlent, but .eql? returns false.
I have a couple questions...
1) Anyone have any idea what might cause this?
2) What controls whether a StringIO or Tempfile is created when parsing a
request object?
Thanks!
dave
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2370 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2012-06-05 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f19ec3dd-85ea-4111-a610-b3182fae85c9@googlegroups.com \
--to=rack-devel@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).