From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivered-To: chneukirchen@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.141.15 with SMTP id o15cs447389rvd; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:43:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mr.google.com ([10.101.131.33]) by 10.101.131.33 with SMTP id i33mr2883301ann.36.1263879798576 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:43:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.131.33 with SMTP id i33mr168826ann.36.1263879796885; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:43:16 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.213.3.206 with SMTP id 14ls163991ebo.0.p; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:43:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.100.7 with SMTP id w7mr1083643ebn.2.1263879795453; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:43:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.100.7 with SMTP id w7mr1083642ebn.2.1263879795422; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:43:15 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com (mail-ew0-f228.google.com [209.85.219.228]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 12si631248ewy.10.2010.01.18.21.43.14; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:43:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nicksieger@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.228 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.228; Received: by mail-ew0-f228.google.com with SMTP id 28so4998374ewy.37 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:43:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.90.139 with SMTP id e11mr2473734wef.111.1263879794078; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:43:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:43:14 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Friends_of_Rack_=E2=88=A9_Friends_of_JRuby_=28was_Re=3A_Ra?= =?UTF-8?Q?ck_test_spec=5Frack=5Fruntime_fails_on_JRuby_due_to_timing=29?= From: Nick Sieger To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nicksieger@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.228 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nicksieger@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: nicksieger@gmail.com Reply-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list rack-devel@googlegroups.com; contact rack-devel+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/t/200889b8e641f0f4 X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/msg/bcdc06624c9ba40f Sender: rack-devel@googlegroups.com List-Unsubscribe: , List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yeah, anyone seen that before? For some reason the logger on the ci box doesn't include the severity level in the output by default. 1) Failure: test_spec {Rack::Logger} 001 [logs to rack.errors](Rack::Logger) [./test/spec_rack_logger.rb:18]: <"Program started\nNothing to do!\n"> expected to be =~ . /Nick On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > Interesting failure out of the gate on Ruby 1.8.6...some sort of weird > log-processing issue? > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Nick Sieger wrote: >> I'm on the Rack list as well, but (bad me) I haven't been diligent >> enough to run Rack tests regularly. >> >> I've got some CI set up for Rack with both Ruby 1.8.6 and JRuby trunk >> at http://ci.jruby.org/view/Rack/, we'll see how they go. >> >> /Nick >> >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter >> wrote: >>> If we get this green, I may advocate we set up a CI build for >>> JRuby+Rack somewhere. We've got a server (ci.jruby.org) where we could >>> put it, and it's obviously a pretty critical piece of infrastructure. >>> >>> As for JRuby actives on the Rack lists...I'm not sure... >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Ryan Tomayko wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter >>>> wrote: >>>>> This came up because a friend of JRuby is working to prepare a Gentoo >>>>> ebuild, and wants to get all related packages running green. >>>> >>>> Speaking of, are there any friends of JRuby that are active on the >>>> rack list? It'd be cool if someone could sign up for ensuring the test >>>> suite is green before shipping new releases. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ryan >>>> >>> >> >