From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivered-To: chneukirchen@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.141.15 with SMTP id o15cs430522rvd; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:04:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mr.google.com ([10.101.165.32]) by 10.101.165.32 with SMTP id s32mr8214853ano.38.1263848649435 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:04:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.165.32 with SMTP id s32mr486826ano.38.1263848647061; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:04:07 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.213.3.206 with SMTP id 14ls19604ebo.0.p; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:04:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.27.1 with SMTP id g1mr725135ebc.9.1263848645635; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:04:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.27.1 with SMTP id g1mr725134ebc.9.1263848645585; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:04:05 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mail-ew0-f213.google.com (mail-ew0-f213.google.com [209.85.219.213]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 18si228129ewy.8.2010.01.18.13.04.04; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:04:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nicksieger@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.213 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.213; Received: by mail-ew0-f213.google.com with SMTP id 5so3819031ewy.14 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:04:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.93.70 with SMTP id k48mr2153681wef.134.1263848644256; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:04:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:04:04 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Friends_of_Rack_=E2=88=A9_Friends_of_JRuby_=28was_Re=3A_Ra?= =?UTF-8?Q?ck_test_spec=5Frack=5Fruntime_fails_on_JRuby_due_to_timing=29?= From: Nick Sieger To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nicksieger@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.213 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nicksieger@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: nicksieger@gmail.com Reply-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list rack-devel@googlegroups.com; contact rack-devel+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/t/200889b8e641f0f4 X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/msg/c8282181be7956fd Sender: rack-devel@googlegroups.com List-Unsubscribe: , List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm on the Rack list as well, but (bad me) I haven't been diligent enough to run Rack tests regularly. I've got some CI set up for Rack with both Ruby 1.8.6 and JRuby trunk at http://ci.jruby.org/view/Rack/, we'll see how they go. /Nick On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > If we get this green, I may advocate we set up a CI build for > JRuby+Rack somewhere. We've got a server (ci.jruby.org) where we could > put it, and it's obviously a pretty critical piece of infrastructure. > > As for JRuby actives on the Rack lists...I'm not sure... > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Ryan Tomayko wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter >> wrote: >>> This came up because a friend of JRuby is working to prepare a Gentoo >>> ebuild, and wants to get all related packages running green. >> >> Speaking of, are there any friends of JRuby that are active on the >> rack list? It'd be cool if someone could sign up for ensuring the test >> suite is green before shipping new releases. >> >> Thanks, >> Ryan >> >